Read the Blog
Environmental Law Quarterly Update - Q2 2021
Nicola Finnerty
Following a three year investigation by the Environment Agency, two companies, UK Environmental Limited and European Metal Recycling Limited, pleaded guilty to two charges each after they took advantage of a quarry that became an illegal tipping site. The companies were required to pay a total of £913,000, which included prosecution costs totalling £433,000. Confiscation orders were made of £7,048 and £32,958 respectively. The case follows the related convictions of Mark Foley, reported in the Q2 update here.
Following guilty pleas to 51 offences, on 9 July 2021 Southern Water was fined £90m for discharging between 16 and 21 billion litres of raw sewage into the rivers and coastal waters in Kent, Hampshire and Sussex. Between January 2010 and December 2015 there were thousands of illegal discharges of raw sewage at 17 different sites across the North Kent coast and the Solent. The sewage was released over a total period of 61,704 hours, equating to just over seven years.
The sentencing Judge said that each of the offences “…seen in isolation, shows a shocking and wholesale disregard for the environment, for the precious and delicate ecosystems….for human health and for the fisheries and other legitimate businesses that depend on the vitality of the coastal waters” with Southern Water’s “…previous persistent pollution of the environment over very many years” aggravating the case further. Concluding the company had been obstructive during the investigation and that all but one of the offences were committed deliberately by Southern Water’s board of directors, the Judge held “…history shows that fines of hundreds of thousands or low millions of pounds have not had any effect on the Defendant’s offending behaviour. It is necessary to set a fine which will bring home to the management of this and other companies the need to comply with laws that are designed to protect the environment. Individual shareholders may, I accept, have no direct responsibility for the offending. Their investments may suffer as a result of a substantial fine and its consequences. But if that results in large institutional investors taking a more active role in ensuring that the companies that they invest in comply with the law, then that is not inconsistent with the purposes of sentencing, which include the reduction of crime”.
A costs order of £2,542,428.51 was ordered but no confiscation order was sought, with the fine encompassing any benefit estimated to have been derived by Southern Water from its offending (£36m). For more information see our previous blog here.
Shortly after Southern Water’s £90m fine was imposed, on 13 July 2021 the Environment Agency published its annual report of England’s nine water and sewage companies’ environmental performance. It found that no single company had met the expectations for the period 2015–2020 with four companies rated poor or requiring improvement. See our earlier blog on the 2020 report here.
On 30 July it was reported that Biffa Waste Services Limited, the UK’s leading waste management company, had been fined £1.5m for breaching regulation 23 of the Transfrontier Shipment of Waste Regulations 2007. Following a two week trial, a jury convicted the company for exporting tonnes of waste from private homes, mislabelled as paper, to India and Indonesia in 2018 and 2019. This is Biffa’s second relevant conviction, after being fined £350,000 in 2019 for shipping similar prohibited material to China in 2015 (see our previous blog here).
In July 2021 the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) opened a consultation on amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) which would establish an ‘environmental review’ in the High Court. The ‘environmental review’, created by clause 39 of the Environment Bill, would act as a litigation mechanism for the Office for Environmental Protection, a statutory body also created by the Bill. The deadline for responses was 6 September 2021. A link to the consultation can be found here, with the Law Society’s response here.
On 6 August 2021 it was reported that Environcom England Limited had pleaded guilty of failing to comply with its environmental permit, contrary to Regulation 38(2) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010. The company, which operates a waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) recycling plant, was found to have stored plastic on their site which far exceeded the permitted amount. Environcom was ordered to pay £35,000 in costs and, in relation to other related matters, agreed to pay £20,000 to Lincolnshire Rivers Trust.
On 27 August amendments to the Environment Bill were tabled in order to strengthen the bill by including a legally-binding commitment to halt species decline by 2030. The new amendments align with the G7’s commitment to stop and reverse the loss of biodiversity by the same year. Other changes also introduced included a requirement on water companies to monitor and publish data on sewage discharges; duties placed on the government and water companies regarding storm overflows; and new powers and duties for the Secretary of State in relation to biodiversity gain sites. For more information on the Environment Bill see the Q1 Update here and the government website here.
September saw a focussing on misleading greenwashing claims by two key regulators: the Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) and the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). On 20 September the CMA published its ‘Green Claims Code’, the purpose of which is to explain to businesses how they can check their environmental claims are genuine. Only a few days later the ASA announced their own commitment to setting out industry guidance to ensure adverts do not mislead. Whilst this focus on greenwashing is not new, with the ASA already having upheld complains regarding misleading claims by Ryanair in 2020, BMW in 2017 and Shell in 2008, it is clear that there will be greater regulatory spotlight placed on such claims, with enforcement action taken more readily where breaches are identified. It is also not only the ASA and the CMA who are taking a keener focus, with the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy announcing in August its own review into potential greenwashing within the retail energy sector. For more information on the CMA’s focus see here and here.
On 8 September Yorkshire Water was fined £150,000 and required to pay over £36,000 in costs after the Environment Agency prosecuted the company for causing pollution to enter a tributary at Potter Carr Nature Reserve and breaching their environment permit relating to ammoniacal nitrogen levels. The company, who pleaded to the two offences under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016, apologised and explained it had invested hundreds of thousands of pounds in remedial works.
Applications for the government’s ‘Air Quality Grant’ scheme was formally opened on 3 September. The press release, which built on earlier announcements referred to in the Q2 update, confirmed that at least £1 million of the £9 million available will be directed to projects designed to improve public awareness of the risks surrounding air pollution, one of the key recommendations following the death of Ella Kissi-Debrah. In addition, this year the grant will be focussed on various projects, including those which are aimed at reducing air pollutant exceedances, inform individuals about air quality and the steps they can take to reduce their exposure to pollution. The deadline for applications was 8 October.
On 30 September a range of experts discussed FAFT’s recent report into money laundering arising from environmental crime (see the Q2 update here). The panel discussed the fact that there was no lack of awareness in business as to what environmental issues were, but there was a lack of clarity around what constituted an environmental crime. The need for information sharing across agencies and borders was also discussed to allow businesses and authorities to identify the necessary red flags. The full webinar can be viewed here
Further information
For further information on the issues raised in this blog post, please contact a member of our Health, Safety & Environment team.
Sophie Wood is a Senior Associate in the Criminal Litigation team with extensive experience in advising corporate and individual clients involved in a wide range of internal, criminal and regulatory investigations. Sophie has acted for individuals and companies involved in investigations brought by the Environment Agency, Health and Safety Executive and local authorities, and is a member of the firm’s cross-practice Health, Safety and Environment Group.
This health, safety law and corporate manslaughter update provides a summary of news stories in the period April 2024 – September 2024.
This quarterly update provides a summary of a selection of news stories relating to health and safety law investigations and prosecutions, as well as key corporate manslaughter cases, in the period January 2024 – March 2024.
This quarterly update provides a summary of a selection of news stories relating to health and safety law investigations and prosecutions in the period October 2023 – December 2023.
This quarterly update provides a summary of a selection of news stories relating to health and safety investigations and prosecutions, as well as key corporate manslaughter cases, from the period July – September 2023.
This quarterly environmental law update provides a summary of news stories in the period July 2023 – September 2023.
On 7 September 2023 it was announced that charges were authorised by the CPS against North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT), following an investigation by the Metropolitan Police into the death of 22-year-old patient Alice Figueiredo on 7 July 2015 at Goodmayes Hospital in Redbridge, East London.
This quarterly health, safety law and corporate manslaughter update provides a summary of a selection of news stories relating to health and safety investigations and prosecutions, as well as key corporate manslaughter cases, published in the period April 2023 – June 2023.
On 22 February 2023, FDS Waste Services (“FDS”) and company director, Philip Pidgley, were sentenced, respectively, to a £640,000 fine and six months suspended prison sentence, following their convictions for corporate manslaughter and offences under the Health and Safety at Work Act etc. 1974 (HSWA).
This quarterly health & safety and corporate manslaughter law update provides a summary of news stories in the period July 2022 – December 2022
This quarterly environmental law update provides a summary of news stories in the period July 2022 – December 2022.
The Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 come into force today, introducing new duties under the Fire Safety Order for responsible persons.
This quarterly environmental law update provides a summary of a cross-section of news stories in the period April 2022 - June 2022.
This quarterly update summarises a selection of news stories relating to health and safety investigations and prosecutions published in the period April – June 2022 as well as some of the key corporate manslaughter cases which have been brought in recent months.
This quarterly update provides a summary of a selection number of news stories relating to health and safety investigations and prosecutions, published in the period January - March 2022.
This quarterly environmental law update provides a summary of news stories in the period January 2022 – March 2022
This blogs considers the recent corporate manslaughter conviction of Deco-Pak and two other recent corporate manslaughter cases, Bosley Mill and Aster Healthcare and what they tell us about the current approach to this offence. In January 2022 a garden supplies firm, Deco-Pak was found guilty of corporate manslaughter following a fatal accident at the Deco-Pak premises in Hipperholme, West Yorkshire on 14 April 2017.
On 5 January 2022, Bupa pleaded guilty at Southwark Crown Court to breaches of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. Bupa were ordered to pay a fine of £937,500 and prosecution costs of £104,000. This is the highest ever fine imposed for fire safety breaches under the Fire Safety Order in the UK.
This quarterly environmental law update provides a summary of news stories published in the period October – December 2021.
The built environment presents health and safety risks like no other sector. Whether it be the risk of falls from height, hazardous substances, trapped by items collapsing or overturning, fire or moving vehicles there are a wide range of hazards that need to be managed from the outset. Directors can be held personally liable when health and safety duties are breached. In this blog we explore the scope of personal liability for directors in the built environment.
Last week Assistant Commissioner Fire Safety, Paul Jennings of the London Fire Brigade stated that developers are ‘gaming the system’, looking to reach only the minimum standards required for building safety and ‘bending the rules’. AC Jennings explained that we are not seeing the cultural change within the built environment that we would expect, following the tragic events of the Grenfell Tower fire and the subsequent Hackitt review.
We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.
Nicola Finnerty
Sophie Wood
Jonathan Grimes
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print