The call for cultural change in the financial and professional services sectors is not new. This has arguably been gathering pace since the financial crash of 2007/8. Could we though now be on the cusp of real change?
I was saddened to read the comments by Jonathan Davidson, the Financial Conduct Authority’s Director of Supervision, in The Times recently. He notes that there are still some City firms where an “unhealthy culture” exists, particularly in relation to sexual harassment. He also comments that, notwithstanding attention to this, such as with the #metoo movement, some managers still believe that there is “political correctness gone mad”.
In March 2016 the FCA brought in the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (“SMCR”) for big financial institutions. That regime is to be rolled out for most smaller FCA registered organisations with effect from 9 December 2019. Accordingly, its impact will shortly be felt from “top to bottom” within the financial services sector.
The SMCR has a significant focus on the “fitness and propriety” of individuals. One point made by Jonathan Davidson is that, as far as regulators are concerned, senior managers who allow an unhealthy culture in their organisations may themselves be showing that they are not “fit and proper.”
It is a feature of the SMCR that organisations have to have in place processes to vet their people for fitness and propriety and that every organisation has to make an annual declaration that all their people are fit and proper. It will be interesting to see the extent to which upholding good cultural values will form part of such processes and lead to firms changing their ways.
In addition to the SMRC, I believe that there are some other initiatives that may be indicators that change is afoot (or are they merely “fig leafs”)?
- In March 2018, the Solicitors Regulation Authority issued a strict Warning Notice (followed by a Law Society Practice Note in January 2019) which made clear that a solicitor drafting a non-disclosure agreement (“NDA”) could be committing professional misconduct. The SRA is not famed for its speed in taking action, but the Warning Notice came out quickly following the launch of the #metoo campaign.
- In July 2019, a report was produced by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Whistleblowing. It appears to be generally acknowledged across the political spectrum that whistleblowing is a “good thing” for exposing malpractice and that greater support for whistle blowers would lead to miscreants being more wary that their misdeeds will be called out and sanctions applied. The Report makes many interesting recommendations including: (a) that there should be a Government backed Office (akin to the Equality and Human Rights Commission) with responsibility for investigating malpractice and generally supporting whistle blowers; and (b) aligning whistle blower Employment Tribunal claims (e.g. for unfair dismissal) with discrimination claims whereby the burden of proof would be on the employer to show that their conduct was not to do with whistleblowing, rather than for the (ex)employee to prove that it was.
- In March 2019, the Lloyd’s insurance market commissioned the Banking Standards Board (BSB) to conduct an independent, market-wide culture survey on its behalf. This was the largest ever survey conducted by the insurance sector and was intended to help Lloyd’s understand the working cultures that exist across the Lloyd’s market, including standards of behaviour and conduct, and to inform further action.
- The survey came out in September 2019 and reported that nearly 500 people working in the insurance market have either suffered or observed sexual harassment in the past 12 months. John Neal, the Chief Executive of Lloyd’s, has vowed to stamp out the problems within three to five years and said he would “be very disappointed if we didn’t make significant progress in the next 12 months” (BBC report). In response to the report, Lloyd’s has set out further measures to tackle the problems. These include a “gender balance plan” setting clear, measurable targets and new “standards of business conduct”. Lloyd’s has already threatened lifetime bans for individuals found guilty of improper behaviour, and fines or bans for the firms that employ them.
These are just a few of the initiatives which are taking place. It is clear that there is a desire to improve the business culture. However only time will tell as to whether they lead to meaningful change or whether power and the quest for profit will trump ethical principles.
Latest blogs & news
In a case that attracted national media coverage and emphasises the crucial importance of regulatory compliance and the highest standards of professional conduct in the financial services sector, the High Court dismissed a breach of contract claim brought by an investment manager.
Keeping the crypto market on its toes? The FCA publishes latest cryptoasset consumer research and takes regulatory action against Binance Markets Limited
For the fourth year the FCA has published research on the changing relationship between consumers and cryptoassets. In spite of the pandemic, the strong upward trend in public engagement and media coverage has continued, with the FCA estimating 2.3 million adults now hold cryptoassets.
The discontinuation of LIBOR and phasing in of SONIA in the Sterling Markets, what do we know so far?
Global financial markets are preparing to transition away from the use of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and adopt an appropriate alternative risk free rate (“RFR”) by the end of 2021. What are the reasons for the move away from LIBOR, the progress to date in terms of identifying the Sterling Overnight Index Average (“SONIA”) as the most appropriate alternative rate in the Sterling markets, and the steps still required to be taken to ensure such markets are ready for the phasing out of LIBOR by the end of the year
At the end of last month, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) published a letter written to Danske Bank concerning its breach of the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (SME) Banking Behavioural Undertakings 2002, following loans it had offered under the ‘Bounce Back Loan Scheme’.
As of 10 January 2021, all cryptoasset firms are required to be registered with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) under the Money Laundering Regulations.
FCA focuses on risks associated with unmonitored communications, including the use of unencrypted apps, such as WhatsApp, for sharing potentially sensitive or confidential information when working from home.
As we near the first anniversary of the extension of the Senior Managers & Certification Regime (SM&CR) to solo-regulated FCA firms, the first round of annual fitness and propriety assessments will be topping the to-do lists of many compliance professionals.
The Holiday is Over: Will the FCA’s efforts to support homeowners after the mortgage payment holiday be enough?
One of the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic is that national income has fallen dramatically. In response to concerns from homeowners unable to meet their mortgage repayment requirements due to a drop in income, the Treasury and Financial Conduct Authority announced a ‘mortgage payment holiday’. This was the result of banks agreeing to allow mortgage-holders suffering from a drop in income to pause their repayments. A ban on home repossessions was put in place at the same time
The FCA announced on 5 November that it has banned three individuals from working in the financial services industry for non-financial misconduct.
How should regulated firms respond when issues come to light which call into question the fitness and propriety of a member of staff? In the second part of their series of fitness and propriety blogs, Jill Lorimer and Nick Ralph consider best practice. You can read the first part of the series by clicking here.
The Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) has recently provided information to their regulated firms as to good and bad practice relating to, amongst other things, the carrying out of fitness and propriety (“F&P”) assessments.
Research recently undertaken by the FCA has found that 5.35% of the UK population hold (or have previously held) cryptoassets where in 2019 this figure was 3%. For several years now the Government, the Bank of England and the FCA have been consulting on and considering how best to regulate this burgeoning market.
The news that Stephen Jones, head of UK Finance, has quit over "thoroughly unpleasant" personal comments he made in 2008 about financier Amanda Staveley, is a stark reminder to executives that their past behaviour may one day come back to haunt them.
The indications are that an increasing number of individuals are coming forward, particularly in the financial services sector, to call out wrongdoing.
Whilst the prime minister's broadcast on 10 May did not open the floodgates to City employers requiring staff to "return to work" enmasse, most firms are already drawing up plans for how that should be organised and many of us will have been thinking about what will happen when employers start to update their 'work from home' advice.
Coronavirus (COVID-19) is having an undeniably serious impact on businesses and the global economy. Everyone has been affected in some way. Sadly, the looming financial crash means that many businesses have been impacted to the extent that they will have to put cost-cutting measures in place in the near and mid-term future. For some individuals this will result in their role being put at risk of redundancy.
In a startling opening to a recent Newsnight, presenter Emily Maitlis began with the words “They tell us Coronavirus is a great leveller. It’s not. It's much harder if you’re poor."
Partners need to do what they would advise their own clients to do: be well prepared.
The moral arguments may well still apply but where salaries are less stellar, there may be more for an individual to lose on a relative basis and thornier issues to weigh on a practical level.
While plenty of people in all sectors are now working from home, designated key workers in the financial services industry are still being forced to go to work.