Universities lack the skills to properly investigate sexual misconduct claims
When something goes wrong there is often a clamour for new law. Sometimes that will help, but that does rather depend on what the problem is. The recent outcry over revelations of sexual harassment has largely come about because people chose to do things they should not have done, not because the law failed to tell them they were wrong to do them. There is some confusion over ‘harassment’ terminology but, at root, our current workplace equality laws are good laws. The problem rests with people’s behaviour and the problem needs be addressed by people.
There is already a broad statutory definition of sexual harassment in our key piece of workplace equality legislation, the Equality Act 2010 (summarised at the bottom of this article). The UK definition reflects international standards including an EU definition that we are obliged to conform to. This provides that harassment occurs ‘where unwanted conduct related to the sex of a person occurs with the purpose or effect of violating the dignity of a person, and of creating an intimidating hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment’.
We are currently subject to European law and changing our UK harassment definition now is impractical, but it is worth bearing in mind that UK equality law largely pre-dates European requirements. These laws were not imposed by Europe on an unwilling UK and the Government has committed, politically, to maintaining EU equality standards post-Brexit.
Explaining how the employment harassment definition and discrimination laws apply in practice is the job of employers. Employers can be held responsible if their employees step out of line and it is in their financial and reputational interests to deal with problems as they arise - and, perhaps more importantly, to take steps to prevent them from happening in the first place. Most good employers regularly train employees on equality. This is a good way of both explaining the boundaries and reducing employer risk. Because the definition of harassment is broad, it can apply in a wide variety of ways, many of which are not currently ‘criminal’. Practical examples tailored to the workplace are usually easier to understand and apply. The blurry boundary of the definition is usually around less physical things. There is absolutely no doubt that sexual assault, rape, unwanted sexual touching, asking a colleague to have sex if they want a promotion etc are covered by UK workplace equality laws.
There is also plenty of good quality, free material already available online to UK employers and employees who are unsure about what to do. See, for example, www.acas.org.uk and www.equalityhumanrights.com/en.
Our current workplace equality laws are good and we should think carefully about how any changes might work through in practice. Some thoughts:
Our workplace equality laws are something to be proud of. Let’s keep them. And let’s also avoid distracting from the real task of making sure that we all take practical steps to make things better.
If you have any questions about the issues raised in this article, please contact a member of our employment team.
See also earlier Kingsley Napley articles for ideas on what you can do to help, as an employer or individual:
Under the UK Equality Act 2010, broadly*, a person harasses another if they engage in unwanted conduct
In deciding whether conduct has the effect referred to above the following are taken into account: the perception of the ‘victim’, the other circumstances of the case and whether it is reasonable for the conduct to have that effect.
The relevant ‘protected characteristics’ are age, disability, gender reassignment, race, religion or belief, sex or sexual orientation.
* Please refer to the precise statutory definition, currently at s26 of the Equality Act 2010, before taking any action
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility