Services A-Z     Pricing

Dispute Resolution Law Blog

30 July 2015

The requirements of a residential service charge demand

In the recent case of Tedla v Cambret Court Residence Association Ltd [2012] UK UT 221 (LC), the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) held that a service charge demanded from a residential tenant had not become due as the demand did not clearly identify the landlord and provide the name and address of the landlord as required under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (LTA 1987).

21 July 2015

What does “jurisdiction” mean?

“Jurisdiction” is generally thought to mean “territory”, but a recent case shows that it actually has a wider and, in this case, potentially more costly, meaning.

Fiona Simpson

17 July 2015

Legal Update: a warning against taking “unreasonable advantage” of late filing

In the recent case of VIRIDOR WASTE MANAGEMENT LTD v VEOLIA ES LTD (2015), a factually modest unjust enrichment claim concerning non-taxable waste, developed into a legal battle over one of the most topical issues in the legal profession: the late filing of pleadings a post-Mitchell civil proceedings. 

Katie Allard

3 July 2015

Common problems with wills and how to fix these

Preparing wills can be stressful. Once completed, people are satisfied that their estate will be distributed in accordance with their wishes upon their death. However, problems can arise if the will has not been properly executed. This can sometimes happen if a person has undertaken a DIY will and not followed will formalities. Solicitors and professional will writers can make errors causing the will to be invalid. 

Sameena Munir

22 June 2015

The credit crunch revisited: developments in the international courts

In the aftermath of the credit crunch, many commentators speculated as to whether any banks or credit agencies could be held responsible for the nosedive in the economy.  Some sought to argue that traders who sold mortgaged-backed securities, a type of collateralised debt obligation, to investors could be held liable in civil law through the tort of deceit or fraudulent misrepresentation, and, in turn, the banks could be held vicariously liable.   

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility