Blog
Kingsley Napley’s Medical Negligence Team ‘walks together’ with the Dame Vera Lynn Children’s Charity
Sharon Burkill
Cross-border disputes raise questions on which jurisdiction’s laws govern the determination of privilege. Under English law, the principle of lex fori applies: the law of the forum where the case is being heard applies. When proceedings are conducted in English courts, English law will determine whether communications are protected by privilege.
As alluded to in our recent article ‘Privilege in shareholder disputes – is change afoot?’, the eagerly awaited judgment of Aabar Holdings S.À.R.L v Glencore PLC has provided fresh judicial insight on the validity of the shareholder principle.
Although the shareholder principle has existed for over 135 years, remarkably the High Court has now concluded that the principle is ‘unjustifiable’ and ‘should no longer be applied’.
Officeholders often come into possession of various categories of documents and information over which legal professional privilege (in one of its many guises) may be asserted.
Legal professional privilege (LPP) is a fundamental principle of justice and exists to protect certain categories of communication between lawyers, their clients or a third party from being disclosed to the opposing party and the court.
When solicitors are sued in their professional capacity, an important question arises as to whether documentation relevant to the claim remains subject to legal professional privilege.
Sharon Burkill
Natalie Cohen
Caroline Sheldon
Legal Notices | Privacy Notice | Fraud Warning | Modern Slavery Statement | Complaints | Website Terms | Cookie Policy | Accessibility | Site Map
© 2025 Kingsley Napley LLP. All rights reserved. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, registration number 500046.
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility