Services A-Z     Pricing

A reminder on costs in the context of probate litigation and the importance of mediation

5 September 2019

The most recent decision in the case of Christopher Burgess v Jennifer Penny & anr [2019] EWHC 2034 (Ch) serves as a useful reminder that the principles applicable to costs in the context of probate litigation are different from the costs of other litigation and the importance of mediation.
 
The substantive judgment concerned the much publicised dispute between three siblings in relation to the distribution of the estate of their late mother, Freda Burgess. The two sisters, Jennifer Penny and Catherine Kennard alleged that their mother did not have knowledge and approval of the contents of a Will executed in January 2013 bequeathing her circa £1.5 million estate equally between her three children. At the time, the press made much of the fact that during the proceedings significant emphasis was placed by the sisters on the fact that their brother, Christopher Burgess, was richer than they were. The court found the will to be valid and consequently that the estate should be split equally in accordance with Freda’s wishes.
 
In making her judgment in relation to how the costs of the litigation should be dealt with, Mrs Catherine Newman QC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge adopted the starting position that costs were at her discretion highlighting the applicable paragraphs of the CPR:
 

44.2

1. The court has discretion as to:
a. whether costs are payable by one party to another;
b. the amount of those costs; and
c. when they are to be paid.

2. If the court decides to make an order about costs:

a. the general rule is that the unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party; but
b. the court may make a different order.
 
Of the three main issues at trial, Christopher Burgess had been successful in relation to two of the issues. It was however also noted that the third issue in relation to which Mr Burgess had lost would have contributed to a significant part of the trial preparation and the evidence. In the first instance the judge thus concluded that the starting position in relation to costs be that the sisters should pay half of their brother’s costs and Mr Burgess should pay half of his sisters’ costs (to be subject to detailed assessment if not agreed).
 
The judge then turned her mind to those rules specific to contentious probate cases, as derived from Spiers v English [1907] and more recently summarised in the case of Kostic v Chaplin [2008] as follows:
 
  1. the court may order the unsuccessful party’s costs to be paid out of the estate if the litigation has been caused by the testator.
  2. if the circumstances lead reasonably to an investigation of the matter, then the court may make no order as to costs.
The judge turned to the judgment of Mr Justice Henderson in the Kostic case to derive the following additional principles from the earlier authorities referred to therein by way of further guidance:
 
a. Do the facts warrant an order different from that which would be made if costs simply followed the event?
 
b. Does one or other of the losing parties deserve to be relieved from being chargeable with costs because they did nothing more than fail in a suit which was justified by good and sufficient grounds for doubt?
 
c. Were one or more of the parties led reasonably to the bona fide belief that there were good grounds for impeaching the will?
 
d. Would departing from the general rule encourage fruitless litigation spurred on by a belief that all of the costs will come out of the estate? The courts are increasingly alert to the dangers or encouraging litigation and discouraging settlement of doubtful claims if costs are allowed out of the estate to the unsuccessful party.
 
e. Less importance is attached today than in the 19th Century to the independent duty to the Court to investigate the circumstances in which a will was executed and satisfy itself as to its validity.
 
In this case whilst there was clearly uncertainty as to whether the will had been “done properly” in circumstances whereby the sisters had confirmed that they were both content with equal division as a matter of principle High Court litigation to challenge the will was “not obviously reasonable”. 
 
The judge went on to highlight the unreasonableness of the sisters complete refusal to mediate on the basis that they wanted an admission from their brother that what he had done was wrong and did not consider that objective would be achieved at mediation. Mrs Catherine Newman QC emphasised that “mediation is not just about one side getting what they want. That is a misconception of the purpose of mediation. Mediation should be about attempting to reach a solution which both parties can live with as better alternative to litigation”. 
 
Taking all factors into consideration the conclusion reached by the judge was that initial enquiries concerning the circumstances surrounding the 2013 will was reasonable but the onward conduct of the litigation and refusal to mediate was not. The appropriate order in this case was that the parties should bear their own costs.
 

About the author

Katherine Pymont is a Senior Associate in the Dispute Resolution team. She has a broad spectrum of litigation experience with particular expertise in Wills, Trusts and Inheritance Disputes.

Latest blogs & news

The future of will disputes part 4: Challenging validity based on capacity

For a will to be valid, the testator must have had testamentary capacity at the time it was made. Testamentary capacity refers to the mental ability of the testator to make a valid will.

The future of will disputes part three: challenging validity based on forgery and fraud

When a loved one dies, the terms of their will can sometimes surprise surviving family members, with unexpected beneficiaries or unequal distribution of the estate. In England and Wales, individuals have the freedom to leave their estate to anyone, with no legal obligation to provide for specific family members. Even if the will seems unfair, the law generally upholds the testator's wishes, if the will has been validly made. However, certain family members and dependants may be able to bring a claim against the estate (under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975), if adequate provision has not been made for them under a will.

The future of will disputes part 2: Challenging validity based on issues with execution

In order for a will to be validly executed it must comply with the requirements set out at Section 9 of the Wills Act 1837.

Willing my cryptocurrency away: how to leave cryptoassets in a Will

The increase in the value of cryptoassets has undoubtedly contributed to the continued interest and adoption of this still relatively new asset class across organisations and individuals. The ease of purchasing, selling or transferring a cryptoasset has improved significantly over the last few years (and which has in part stemmed from the development of the regulatory environment). However, there is still a technical barrier to entry. This presents a practical problem; if your assets pass to your loved ones on your death, how do you ensure that they are able to actually access and benefit from any cryptoassets that you hold?

Statutory wills, resolving will disputes during the testator’s lifetime

When a testator makes a will, they must have the requisite testamentary capacity to do so. If they do not, this may be grounds for a disappointed beneficiary to issue a probate claim to challenge the validity of the will after the testator's death. 

Broken promises? Safeguarding family land

Agreements between family members regarding ownership of land are not always formally recorded, as they are more likely to trust one another to abide by any promises or assurances made. However, where no formal agreement is in place, the owner of the land may not feel bound to abide by any promise, and recollections may vary about what was actually said, particularly when this goes back a number of years. It is important for advisors to be live to potential interests that may arise in land, even where formal agreements have not been put in place, to assist them in safeguarding their clients’ interests.

Bringing assets back into the estate: The recovery of misappropriated estate assets

There are an increasing number of cases before the courts concerning the misappropriation of estate assets. Typically, this involves assets being misappropriated by a beneficiary, family member, or personal representative following death, but may also concern assets which were misappropriated during the deceased’s lifetime.

All this will one day be yours; proprietary estoppel continuing to make headlines

This weekend, the national press has reported on another bitter inheritance dispute, this time centred on a strawberry farm. 

Trust and Estate Disputes Quarterly Round-Up: April - June 2024

This contentious trust and probate litigation round-up provides a summary of a cross-section of reported decisions handed down in the courts of England and Wales in the period April 2024 - June 2024.

Making a will following a diagnosis of dementia and avoiding validity challenges

It is sometimes assumed that a will cannot be valid if it was made by a person who suffers from dementia. However, many people retain capacity to make a will for a significant period following their diagnosis.

Dying matters week – A day in court is not always the best option

The last thing someone usually needs when dealing with the death of a loved one is to face a legal dispute involving members of their family. Further, the prospect of family members in conflict is unlikely to be what anyone wants to happen after they pass away.

When the administration gets tough, the independent administrators get going

Appointing an independent administrator is often a good option when considering the administration of an estate; importantly, it should allow all beneficiaries to feel confident that the estate has been dealt with neutrally and in a professional manner. 

Probate claims – the rules still apply

Civil litigation must be conducted according to the procedures and time limits set out in the Civil Procedure Rules. These rules, which are regularly updated, make up a procedural code whose overriding aim is to enable the courts to deal with cases justly. The rules set out in detail how a case is to be conducted in the civil courts in England and Wales and all parties to litigation, whether they are represented by solicitors or not, are expected to comply with them.

Empowering beneficiaries to challenge costs: The Kenig v. Thomson Snell & Passmore case

Last month, The Court of Appeal delivered an important costs judgement which has the potential to significantly impact how beneficiaries can challenge solicitors’ fees in contentious trusts, probate, private wealth and estate proceedings.

The rise in inheritance tax investigations by HMRC

HMRC recovered a record £326million following investigations into underpayments of inheritance tax in the year ending March 2022. Perhaps unsurprisingly in light of these figures, it seems that HMRC have continued their focus on inheritance tax investigations since then.

Financial abuse: A growing global problem

The issue of financial abuse is growing, particularly in respect of older people. Financial abuse involves the unauthorised and improper use of the assets of a vulnerable person, and can include theft, coercion, fraud or the misuse of powers by third parties in a position of trust. 

Trust and Estate Disputes Quarterly Round-Up: October - December 2023

This contentious trust and probate litigation quarterly round-up provides a summary of a cross-section of reported decisions handed down in the courts of England and Wales in the period October 2023 - December 2023.

What happens if a will has been made but can no longer be found? Exploring the presumption of revocation

One enquiry that we frequently receive is that, although the enquirer is certain that the deceased wrote a will, it cannot be located (or a will has been produced that they do not believe to be the most recent version).

Law commission considers wills and predatory marriage – does the law need to change?

The Law Commission’s consultation in which it has sought views on whether marriage should continue to revoke a will in light of concerns regarding predatory marriages, closed on 8 December 2023.

Disputing a will of an illiterate testator

A will dispute in the High Court concerning an illiterate testator has received a lot of media attention recently. The deceased’s three eldest children are said to be contesting his will on the basis that it was a mistake that they had been disinherited because their father could not have read his will.

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility