Services A-Z     Pricing

Criminal Law Blog

26 May 2017

No smoke without fire – Don’t take the risk!

Each time you fly you will hear certain warnings given; to obey the crew, stay at your seat with your seatbelt fastened until the pilot turns off the seatbelt sign and a reminder that the flight is non-smoking.  These warnings are used globally and a surprise to none.  Although some remember a time when smoking on flights were permitted and acceptable for many that is a distant memory.  

26 May 2017

The Trial: A Murder in the Family – The Jury

As The Trial approaches its denouement we spent the penultimate episode focused on the closing speeches and the beginning of the jury’s deliberation. 

Matthew Hardcastle

26 May 2017

‘Fake News’ and the Propaganda Campaign

The Times/Kingsley Napley Student Advocacy Competition 2017 launched on 18 May 2017. The title this year is: Do we need new laws to combat fake news?”.

24 May 2017

Cyber-security, ransomware and the GDPR

One in five NHS Trusts were hit by a cyber-attack known as “Wannacry” on 12 May 2017 leading to PCs and data being locked up and held for ransom. The malicious ransomware known as WanaCrypt0r has hit companies and other organisations, from Russia to Australia, and Europol estimated there had been 200,000 victims in at least 150 countries. It was alleged that NHS networks were left vulnerable because they were using outdated Windows XP software, which is no longer supported by Microsoft, and therefore security upgrades had not been installed. The National Cyber Security Centre warned that more cases of the ransomware were expected to come to light beyond the NHS and “possibly at a significant scale”. 

24 May 2017

The Trial: A Murder in the Family – The Evidence

One of the most frustrating features of The Trial has been the deployment of the ‘evidence’ to the audience. This is not a criticism of the way the case has been presented to the jury – the prosecution or defence teams have ably demonstrated the quality of the criminal bar – but of the decision to intercut the ‘evidence’ with material which wouldn’t be before a jury. This has made following the trial, as the jury have, impossible. 

Matthew Hardcastle

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility