Blog
Coronavirus business loan scheme fraud
Philip Salvesen
This has largely been reported through the prism of organised crime, which is believed to be responsible for around half of the fraudulent claims. That level of criminality may be reflected on with a resigned tut, given that the scope for abuse of the scheme was clear from the outset. But, what about the other potential c. £2bn lost to fraud?
This potential loss is to improper claims, for example: businesses ‘pushing the envelope’, operating in a ‘grey area’, or taking wrong decisions for the immediate survival of the business. Behaviour of this nature often operates on a spectrum of culpability. At the lower end, there is the genuine mistake or the erroneous decision made in good faith. At the higher end, there is sharp practice and a desire to use the scheme to gain as much money as possible.
The best time to address mistakes – and mistakes of judgment – has arguably passed as HMRC’s ‘amnesty’ period ended on 20 October 2020. The focus will now be on investigating claims.
On 07 September, Jim Harra (chief executive of HMRC) gave evidence to the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee that HMRC had received 8,000 notifications from employees highlighting potential non-compliance. These may, or may not, fall part of the 27,000 ‘high-risk’ claims being looked into. Of those high-risk claims, HMRC expects that around 10,000 will be investigated.
The receipt of misappropriated funds brings with it a number of different issues for companies to manage. The most immediate concern is likely to be with the taxman and the reputational damage that may follow. However, the knottiest problem may well be how to manage potentially criminal funds which have entered, and possibly exited, a company’s accounts. All of these issues are better managed proactively.
During the ‘amnesty’, there was an amenable ear to the repayment of funds even those repaid due to mistakes – or mistakes of judgment. As it stands, HMRC may still be receptive to companies ‘correcting’ claims which have been made, but the mood is changing. The coronavirus crisis continues to put a significant strain on public resources and there is likely to be little, and reducing, sympathy for companies that have incorrectly claimed funds and have not put in place steps to undo that error.
For further information on the issues raised in this blog post, please contact a member of our criminal litigation team.
Nicola Finnerty is a Partner in the Criminal Litigation department. She has experience of fraud, corruption (including the Bribery Act) and cartel matters, financial compliance, money laundering, asset seizure and confiscation cases, through to sexual offence cases, drugs, murder and offensive weapon crimes.
Matthew Hardcastle is a Senior Associate in the Criminal Litigation department. His experience encompasses cases involving general and white collar crime. Matthew has significant experience of advising clients during interviews under caution both following an arrest and during a voluntary attendance. Matthew’s experience includes advising high profile individuals and advising in matters which attract significant media interest. His experience enables him to provide his clients with early advice which they can rely upon throughout the life of their case. His approach to cases means he is able to quickly grasp the details of the prosecution case and to advise accordingly.
We recognise that these unique times are presenting unprecedented challenges for our clients and we are here to support you in any way we can.
Click to viewAlex Torpey covers the key things to look out for if you are relying on the Force Majeure clause.
Watch the video on LinkedInRachel Freeman, Partner in our Family Law team, addresses some issues that we are seeing arise for separated parents in the current crisis.
Read the blogAndrew Solomon speaks about the challenge for tech companies and coworking spaces during the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen to the podcastAlun Milford, Partner in our Criminal Litigation team, provides an in-depth look at the legal basis behind the current lockdown.
Read the blogOn Friday 3 April, immigration partner and head of department, Nick Rollason, hosted a webinar looking at urgent issues employers are facing during the COVID-19 crisis and answered some of the key questions being raised.
Watch the webinar recordingOn Thursday 9 April, Andreas White, Partner in our Employment Law Team, delivered an overview of the scheme with a focus of the key legal issues for UK employers.
Watch the webinar recordingWill instructions have apparently risen by 30% since COVID-19 reached our shores. What effect does COVID-19 have on Will signings? James Ward and Diva Shah in our Private Client team blog.
Read the blogCharlotte Bradley, Head of our Family Law Team, reflects on how the COVID-19 crisis has affected working parents like her.
Read the blogCalls for a public inquiry are continuing to mount and are likely to prove difficult to resist. In this blog, Sophie Kemp considers the framework for such inquiries, and the key issues likely to form the core of its terms of reference.
Read the blogWe welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.
Philip Salvesen
Nicola Finnerty
Richard Fox
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email to a friend Print