This week the government announced a further loan scheme to help small and medium-sized businesses affected by coronavirus. In a reaction to the criticism received for the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (“CBILS”) (see our CBILS FAQs for more information) and its implementation, the Bounce Bank Loan Scheme is promised as a simplified scheme which allows small and medium-sized businesses to borrow up to 25% of their turnover, capped at £50,000.
Why has the government introduced yet another loan scheme?
The Bounce Back Loan Scheme is all about getting money quickly to the small businesses that need it. Although more applications are now being processed under CBILS and money is being loaned by banks, it was slow to start and the scheme has needed to be adapted since its initial implementation. However there is still criticism that not enough businesses are getting the money that they need, and that the government is failing to give sufficient comfort by guaranteeing only 80% of the amount to be lent under CBILS. Whatever the reasons, it does appear that CBILS is still faltering and the value of loans approved under CBILS has actually declined from more than £1.45bn in the seven days to 21 April, to only £1.33bn in the seven days to 28 April.
By launching a brand new scheme rather than further varying CBILS, Chancellor Rishi Sunak will hope that he has sidestepped such criticism. Under the new Bounce Back Loan Scheme, 100% of the loan will be guaranteed, and even more importantly there will be no forward-looking tests of business viability and no complex eligibility criteria. Despite this, the government is still resisting calls to provide 100% guarantee for all of the new loan schemes. In his statement the Chancellor said that by only providing the 100% guarantee for loans under the Bounce Back Loan Scheme, which is capped at £50,000, it balances the risk to the taxpayer against the need to get money to the businesses that need it most.
What are the key points to note in the Bounce Back Loan Scheme?
- The government will guarantee 100% of the loan
- There won’t be any fees or interest to pay for the first 12 months.
- The government will work with lenders to agree a low standardised rate of interest for the remaining period of the loan.
- Loan terms will be up to six years.
- No repayments will be due during the first 12 months.
- The scheme will be delivered through a network of accredited lenders.
How do I know if my business qualifies for the Bounce Back Loan Scheme?
You can apply for a loan if your business is based in the UK, has been negatively affected by coronavirus and was not an ‘undertaking in difficulty’ on 31 December 2019.
The following businesses are not eligible to apply:
- banks, insurers and reinsurers (but not insurance brokers)
- public sector bodies
- state-funded primary and secondary schools
You also cannot apply if you are already claiming under CBILS. However if you have already received a loan of up to £50,000 under CBILS and want to transfer it into the Bounce Bank Loan Scheme, you can arrange this with your lender until 4 November 2020.
Lessons learnt from CBILS?
Further details of the loan scheme are still to be announced ahead of its launch on Monday but, given the short timeframe in which to roll this out, some are already predicting similar teething problems to those faced by CBILS. For example, there have already been reports that the banks were kept in the dark as to what the lending limit would be, meaning further work had to be carried out this week by the banks to prepare for the launch of the scheme.
Launching the Bounce Back Loan Scheme in such a short time frame was always going to be a massive challenge for the government and the banks. Businesses have ceased trading in huge numbers across the country, and many will not return. For those that remain, they are desperately in need of financial support.
Lessons do seem to have been learnt from implementing CBILS. For the new scheme, the information that applicants will need to provide is much less detailed. The government has also promised that businesses will be able to apply online through a short and simple standardised application form. This sounds promising, as does the stated intention to provide a response, and to distribute the funds, within a matter of days of the date of application.
One of the other criticisms of CBILS is that banks are prioritising their existing clients. The standardisation of interest rates and the fact that there will be no fees for the Bounce Back Loan Scheme should mean that, unlike under CBILS, businesses won’t be at a disadvantage as a result of their lack of an established banking relationship.
The hope is also that, having already implemented CBILS and because of the minimal financial checks which will be required for a Bounce Back Loan, banks will be able to process applications under the new scheme much more quickly. However this may depend on the level of take up from businesses, particularly if some businesses see this as 'free-money' (at least for now) which is easy to get hold of.
There are still a lot of unknowns but with the scheme due to launch at 9am on 4 May, we won’t have to wait long to find out.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Emer Hughes is a Senior Associate in the corporate and commercial department. She advises small to medium-sized organisations across a range of sectors and industries, including startups and charities on a broad range of corporate and commercial transactions.
Latest blogs and news
Nick Ralph looks in detail at recent cases that have stemmed from the pandemic, including a refusal to attend work due to fear of contracting the virus.
One of the most topical issues regarding Covid-19 is that of vaccination and whether it should be mandatory.
Stories regarding big employers such as Citibank in the US mandating vaccination as a condition of employment (“no jab, no job”), the experience of great sports personalities such as Novak Djokovic and the decision of the Supreme Court in the US last week regarding laws mandating vaccination in the private sector, have all brought this issue into the spotlight.
So what is the legal position in the UK?
Any day now the Covid-19 Inquiry will publish draft terms of reference. This will be a significant event. Once agreed, the terms of reference will determine the scope and length of the inquiry which is due to begin its work in the Spring. In turn this will have a direct impact on how valuable the inquiry turns out to be.
On 16 March 2020 Number 10 advised those living in the UK against “non-essential travel” in order to curb the growing outbreak of Coronavirus. This encouraged many office-based businesses to communicate to their employees that they should work from home until further notice.
In March 2021 the Chancellor announced the establishment of a taskforce to investigate those who may have fraudulently made use of government schemes set up to protect individuals and businesses against the economic impact of COVID-19 – such as the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) (widely referred to as the Furlough scheme), the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS) and the ‘Eat Out to Help Out’ Scheme.
This week, the Government announced that Covid-19 vaccinations will be made compulsory for care home staff, raising strong emotions on both sides of the argument.
The devastating economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented levels of government support aimed at keeping jobs intact and businesses afloat. Although the news is beginning to promise a path out of lockdown and a gradual return to some degree of normality, equally as prominent are reports of fraudulent abuse of the COVID-19 support schemes and the government’s planned response.
In late February 2021 a news article reported that a care home worker had been arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter after a patient died of COVID-19. In late March 2021, two further care home workers were arrested on suspicion of wilful neglect. We look at how those working in care homes can potentially face criminal liability in respect of COVID-19 cases.
In the Budget 2021, presented to Parliament on 3 March, the Chancellor announced that HMRC will establish a taskforce to investigate those who have fraudulently made use of government schemes set up to protect individuals and businesses against the economic impact of COVID-19 – such as the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) (widely referred to as the Furlough scheme) and the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS).
Coaching, Teaching and Support Work in Lockdown: Safeguarding and Data Protection considerations when working with children online
The COVID-19 crisis has forced sports clubs, schools, universities and charities to rapidly change their approaches to coaching, teaching and support work. The regulations on social distancing have forced organisations to innovate; services which had previously been offered mostly or wholly in person were rapidly shifted online during “lockdown 1” and will return online at least for the duration of “lockdown 3”. If the vaccine rollout has the desired effect there will no doubt be some return to “traditional” methods, but it seems very unlikely that the changes brought about by the pandemic will be completely reversed. In this blog, Claire Parry from Kingsley Napley’s Regulatory team and Fred Allen from the Public Law team look at the challenges organisations face engaging with children online.
On 30 March 2021 the provisions of the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (“CIGA”) which allowed purely virtual general meetings will lapse, and the normal rules will apply. ICSA have produced some useful guidance to assist companies in dealing with their general meetings in the light of this change.
We have previously examined how the Government’s Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Schemes (the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS), Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) and Coronavirus Large Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CLBILS)(together the “Schemes”) work. A report issued by the Public Accounts Committee on 10 December 2020 highlights the darker side of the Schemes and what it is costing the UK taxpayer.
In this blog Terence Donovan discuss legal issues arising from the pandemic when considering compensation claims.
FCA focuses on risks associated with unmonitored communications, including the use of unencrypted apps, such as WhatsApp, for sharing potentially sensitive or confidential information when working from home.
The government has now approved the supply of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The reason they have been able to do this so quickly is because they have taken advantage of the temporary authorisation regime laid out by the Human Medicine Regulations of 2012 and 2020. The 2012 Regulations were updated in 2020 specifically to facilitate the smooth rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine. In the public consultation preceding the introduction of these updated regulations, several respondents raised concerns regarding unlicensed vaccines and immunity from civil liability. In practice, very little is known about these regulations and their application. This article seeks to shed some light on the temporary authorisation regime and suggest a means of alleviating concerns in the context of “vaccine hesitancy”.
The Government's latest announcement reducing quarantine requirements for travellers returning to England from 14 to 5 days post-15 December 2020 (providing they can provide a negative test result for COVID-19) once again raises questions for employers on what right they have to influence employees' overseas holiday and travel plans over the Christmas period.
Accounting firms should be bracing themselves for a rise in professional negligence claims as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.
The top five most stressful events in life are commonly regarded as death of a loved one; divorce; major illness or injury; job loss; and moving house (in that order). Some might argue that the Covid-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns should be a new addition to this list. Not only does it make life more stressful but also the first four events more likely.