This Trustees 'Need to KNow' Guide provides general guidance of the law at the date of publication. Specialist advice should also be sought.
Updated July 2020.
What is rectification?
Rectification is a court ordered discretionary remedy allowing a retrospective correction of a mistake to the wording of a document. There must be evidence to demonstrate that the parties were all clear on the terms of the transaction. In the case of a voluntary settlement, the purpose of rectification is to ensure that the trust document reflects the true intentions of the settlor as held by him at the date when the document was executed.
What is Section 48 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985?
In proceedings relating to the estates of deceased persons and trusts, the High Court has the power to authorise action to be taken in reliance on a barrister’s legal opinion where (i) any question of construction has arisen out of the terms of a will or a trust; and (ii) an opinion in writing given by a person who has a 10 year High Court qualification, within the meaning of section 71 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, has been obtained on that question by the personal representatives or trustees under the will or trust.
It is not possible to use Section 48 in circumstances where there is a dispute concerning the question of construction of the trust deed and how it should be corrected.
What is rescission?
Rescission means that a trust is set aside and treated as if it had never been made. This means that the assets revert to the settlor and if they are so minded they are able to start again.
Can a trustee’s actions be set aside?
The rule in the case of Hasting-Bass enabled the Court to set aside actions taken by trustees which had unintended results in certain circumstances.
A trustee’s ability to rely on this rule was significantly restricted following the Supreme Court decision in the combined cases of Pitt v Holt and Futter v Futter. The Supreme Court held that the rule in Hasting-Bass should only apply where the trustees exercise a discretionary power, and act within the terms of that power, but in some way breach their duties in respect of that exercise. In this instance, the act may be voidable by the beneficiaries.
What is the test for rescission on the ground of mistake?
The Supreme Court in Pitt v Holt and Futter v Futter held that there must be a causative mistake of sufficient gravity to render it unjust for the transaction to stand.
How can we help?
We act for trustees, executors, personal representatives and for individuals claiming against estates, trustees or other parties. We also often advise on complex and cross-jurisdictional issues, and regularly work alongside other intermediaries based offshore. Our team is recognised for our expertise in this field by the legal directories: The Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners. If you have any questions arising from this Need to Know please do not hesitate to contact our Trust and Estate Disputes Team.
Latest blogs & news
The future of will disputes part 4: Challenging validity based on capacity
For a will to be valid, the testator must have had testamentary capacity at the time it was made. Testamentary capacity refers to the mental ability of the testator to make a valid will.
The future of will disputes part three: challenging validity based on forgery and fraud
When a loved one dies, the terms of their will can sometimes surprise surviving family members, with unexpected beneficiaries or unequal distribution of the estate. In England and Wales, individuals have the freedom to leave their estate to anyone, with no legal obligation to provide for specific family members. Even if the will seems unfair, the law generally upholds the testator's wishes, if the will has been validly made. However, certain family members and dependants may be able to bring a claim against the estate (under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975), if adequate provision has not been made for them under a will.
The future of will disputes part 2: Challenging validity based on issues with execution
In order for a will to be validly executed it must comply with the requirements set out at Section 9 of the Wills Act 1837.
Willing my cryptocurrency away: how to leave cryptoassets in a Will
The increase in the value of cryptoassets has undoubtedly contributed to the continued interest and adoption of this still relatively new asset class across organisations and individuals. The ease of purchasing, selling or transferring a cryptoasset has improved significantly over the last few years (and which has in part stemmed from the development of the regulatory environment). However, there is still a technical barrier to entry. This presents a practical problem; if your assets pass to your loved ones on your death, how do you ensure that they are able to actually access and benefit from any cryptoassets that you hold?
Statutory wills, resolving will disputes during the testator’s lifetime
When a testator makes a will, they must have the requisite testamentary capacity to do so. If they do not, this may be grounds for a disappointed beneficiary to issue a probate claim to challenge the validity of the will after the testator's death.
Broken promises? Safeguarding family land
Agreements between family members regarding ownership of land are not always formally recorded, as they are more likely to trust one another to abide by any promises or assurances made. However, where no formal agreement is in place, the owner of the land may not feel bound to abide by any promise, and recollections may vary about what was actually said, particularly when this goes back a number of years. It is important for advisors to be live to potential interests that may arise in land, even where formal agreements have not been put in place, to assist them in safeguarding their clients’ interests.
Bringing assets back into the estate: The recovery of misappropriated estate assets
There are an increasing number of cases before the courts concerning the misappropriation of estate assets. Typically, this involves assets being misappropriated by a beneficiary, family member, or personal representative following death, but may also concern assets which were misappropriated during the deceased’s lifetime.
All this will one day be yours; proprietary estoppel continuing to make headlines
This weekend, the national press has reported on another bitter inheritance dispute, this time centred on a strawberry farm.
Trust and Estate Disputes Quarterly Round-Up: April - June 2024
This contentious trust and probate litigation round-up provides a summary of a cross-section of reported decisions handed down in the courts of England and Wales in the period April 2024 - June 2024.
Making a will following a diagnosis of dementia and avoiding validity challenges
It is sometimes assumed that a will cannot be valid if it was made by a person who suffers from dementia. However, many people retain capacity to make a will for a significant period following their diagnosis.
Dying matters week – A day in court is not always the best option
The last thing someone usually needs when dealing with the death of a loved one is to face a legal dispute involving members of their family. Further, the prospect of family members in conflict is unlikely to be what anyone wants to happen after they pass away.
When the administration gets tough, the independent administrators get going
Appointing an independent administrator is often a good option when considering the administration of an estate; importantly, it should allow all beneficiaries to feel confident that the estate has been dealt with neutrally and in a professional manner.
Probate claims – the rules still apply
Civil litigation must be conducted according to the procedures and time limits set out in the Civil Procedure Rules. These rules, which are regularly updated, make up a procedural code whose overriding aim is to enable the courts to deal with cases justly. The rules set out in detail how a case is to be conducted in the civil courts in England and Wales and all parties to litigation, whether they are represented by solicitors or not, are expected to comply with them.
Empowering beneficiaries to challenge costs: The Kenig v. Thomson Snell & Passmore case
Last month, The Court of Appeal delivered an important costs judgement which has the potential to significantly impact how beneficiaries can challenge solicitors’ fees in contentious trusts, probate, private wealth and estate proceedings.
The rise in inheritance tax investigations by HMRC
HMRC recovered a record £326million following investigations into underpayments of inheritance tax in the year ending March 2022. Perhaps unsurprisingly in light of these figures, it seems that HMRC have continued their focus on inheritance tax investigations since then.
Financial abuse: A growing global problem
The issue of financial abuse is growing, particularly in respect of older people. Financial abuse involves the unauthorised and improper use of the assets of a vulnerable person, and can include theft, coercion, fraud or the misuse of powers by third parties in a position of trust.
Trust and Estate Disputes Quarterly Round-Up: October - December 2023
This contentious trust and probate litigation quarterly round-up provides a summary of a cross-section of reported decisions handed down in the courts of England and Wales in the period October 2023 - December 2023.
What happens if a will has been made but can no longer be found? Exploring the presumption of revocation
One enquiry that we frequently receive is that, although the enquirer is certain that the deceased wrote a will, it cannot be located (or a will has been produced that they do not believe to be the most recent version).
Law commission considers wills and predatory marriage – does the law need to change?
The Law Commission’s consultation in which it has sought views on whether marriage should continue to revoke a will in light of concerns regarding predatory marriages, closed on 8 December 2023.
Disputing a will of an illiterate testator
A will dispute in the High Court concerning an illiterate testator has received a lot of media attention recently. The deceased’s three eldest children are said to be contesting his will on the basis that it was a mistake that they had been disinherited because their father could not have read his will.