Blog
Kingsley Napley’s Medical Negligence Team ‘walks together’ with the Dame Vera Lynn Children’s Charity
Sharon Burkill
In the recent case of EAD Solicitors LLP v Abrams, President Langstaff ruled that a company can bring a discrimination claim on the grounds that it has suffered detrimental treatment because of the protected characteristic of someone with whom it is associated.
In 2008 the ECJ made it clear that you didn’t actually have to be disabled yourself to bring a direct disability discrimination claim, provided that you were discriminated against because of your association with a person who is disabled. It was previously thought that this principle of ‘associative discrimination’ only applied in cases of direct discrimination or harassment. However, following the case of Thompson v London Central Bus Company Ltd employers will now need to be wary that the same principle applies in cases of victimisation. In this case it was held that where an employee is victimised, the employee can claim even when the protected act is carried out by another person, provided that they are victimised because of that act. Furthermore, the recent hearing by the Employment Appeal Tribunal makes it clear that there is no requirement for there to be a special relationship in existence between the person who is victimised and the person who carries out the protected act.
Sharon Burkill
Natalie Cohen
Caroline Sheldon
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility