Blog
From garage to unicorn – Employment law lessons for scaling tech teams
Catherine Bourne
The prospect of a Brexit can no longer be ignored. David Cameron is currently planning to seek reform of the EU and an in/out referendum is to be put to the UK by the end of 2017. Some reports suggest that previous strength of business opposition to a Brexit is waning. Alongside sections of strong euro-scepticism within the public, it seems inevitable that employers and employees must begin to think about potential changes to UK employment law and what any such changes could mean for them.
In the case of Cooper Contracting Ltd v Lindsey, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (the “EAT”) dismissed an appeal challenging the compensation awarded to a former employee following a successful unfair dismissal claim. When considering this appeal, the EAT set out a number of important principles that should be considered when deciding whether or not a former employee has properly mitigated their loss.
The recent case of Pnaiser v NHS England and Coventry City Council highlights the dangers for employers of deviating from agreed written references and giving additional, but contradictory, verbal comments on a former employee. The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s (“EAT”) decision also makes it clear that potential new employers should be wary of revoking any offer of employment if there is a suggestion that a verbal reference may be influenced by discrimination.
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility