Who’d be a Whistle Blower?

27 May 2020

The indications are that an increasing number of individuals are coming forward, particularly in the financial services sector, to call out wrongdoing.  As recently reported in the Financial Times, the total number of whistleblowing tip-offs to the Financial Conduct Authority in 2019 was up 3.5 per cent overall from the previous year.  Importantly, the biggest increase was in reports about breaches of standards of professional behaviour — which rose 35 per cent.
 

In my experience, having acted for individual whistle-blowers over many years, they are a group of brave, principled and determined individuals.  The law on whistle blower protection is complex and employers typically fight such claims vigorously, taking as many technical legal points as they can, and seeking to take advantage of having “deeper pockets” to fund litigation.

It is the nature of whistle blowing that the wrong doing called out is often about matters which other colleagues are (or should be) aware.  So, by highlighting breaches of standards, the whistle blower stands to set themselves apart from not just the actual wrongdoer(s) but also from colleagues (who were maybe work friends) who have been prepared to turn a blind eye to what was going on.  Such colleagues may not like the implicit criticism that they might have done something.  Loyalties and trust are typically tested in whistle blowing cases and the stress can often lead to mental health issues.

So it is heartening to see cases where employees have brought whistle blowing cases and won.  If there is a trend, in my view, it is in favour of the employees, and the Tribunals and Courts are recognising the pressures which whistle blowers face.

Recent cases

  • Rihan v Ernst and Young Global Ltd [2020]: In this case a partner working in Dubai, who for technical reasons could not rely on the UK statutory whistleblowing regime, succeeded in a negligence claim in the High Court that EY had breached a duty to take reasonable steps to prevent him from suffering financial loss by reason of its failure to perform an audit ethically and without professional misconduct.  The facts dated back to 2013, when Mr Rihan conducted an assurance audit of a Dubai-based precious metals dealer. He found serious irregularities suggesting that it might be involved in money laundering and was subjected to pressure by the local regulator to cover this up. Mr Rihan resisted and escalated the issue at the highest levels within EY. Fearing for their safety, he and his family fled Dubai for the UK and Mr Rihan went on sick leave. Mr Rihan brought claims and was ultimately awarded almost $11 million in damages for past and future loss of earnings.
  • Timis v Osipov [2018]: Mr Osipov was briefly the CEO of International Petroleum Ltd (IP Ltd). Shortly after commencing his role, Mr Osipov made a number of whistleblowing disclosures, including in relation to corporate governance and compliance with foreign law relevant to IP Ltd. The company was effectively controlled by two non-executive directors (Mr Timis and Mr Sage). Mr Osipov was dismissed at the direction of the NEDs and issued proceedings in the Employment Tribunal against not just IP Ltd but also the NEDs personally.  The Tribunal upheld Mr Osipov’s claims and found that the NEDs were jointly and severally liable with IP Ltd to compensate Mr Osipov for the losses he had suffered as a result of his dismissal.  The Tribunal awarded approximately £1,745,000 in compensation.  The case went to the Court of Appeal which upheld the Tribunal’s decision.  The personal liability of the NEDs was important in this case because, by the time of the proceedings, the Company was insolvent.
  • Chesterton Global Ltd v Nurmohamed [2017]: In this case the Court of Appeal considered the meaning of "public interest".  Since 2013, whistle blowing legislation has required there to be a “public interest” aspect for a disclosure to be protected.  This test was aimed at closing a “loop hole” that employees could potentially get whistle blower protection simply by complaining of a breach of their own contract of employment. Mr Nurmohamed was employed as a senior manager at a branch of Chestertons, the estate agent. On several occasions he made complaints to two directors about manipulation of the company's accounts. He asserted that the company was deliberately supplying inaccurate figures to its accountant, overstating actual costs and liabilities, resulting in lower profit-based commission payments for around 100 senior managers (including himself). Mr Nurmohamed was dismissed, and brought various claims against Chestertons.  He won. The tribunal concluded that it was Mr Nurmohamed's reasonable belief that the disclosures were in the interest of 100 senior managers, and that this was a sufficient section of the public to amount to being a matter in the public interest. This was the case even though Mr Nurmohamed was mostly motivated by concern about his own income.  The case went up to the Court of Appeal which essentially agreed with this reasoning.

 

One of the reasons why employees do go to the trouble of bringing whistleblowing claims is that, unlike for “normal” unfair dismissal claims, where there is a cap of about £90k, there is no cap on the level of compensation that can be awarded by a Tribunal in a whistleblowing case.  For higher earners, the cap can be a major issue.

A frequent battle ground in whistle blower cases relates to the “causal link” i.e. whether the alleged blowing of the whistle was really the reason for the dismissal or detrimental treatment.  Employers often argue that, even if there was a protected disclosure, it was not the reason for the treatment, rather it was to do with, say, the employee’s poor performance or them committing some other act of misconduct.

In practice, most whistle blower cases do settle before they come to a full hearing.  One of the reasons for this is that, if the allegations of wrongdoing have any basis in fact, it will be embarrassing (at the very least) for the company concerned and its management to fight the case.  It may make business and PR sense for the company to make a payment rather than to “air its dirty laundry in public”.

In conclusion, I would make the point that whistleblowing is generally recognised to be a good thing, encouraging organisations to act ethically and within the law.  As the world becomes more complex and enforcement authorities more stretched, we are all the more reliant on the insiders to expose wrongdoing.

Further information

If you would like any further information or advice regarding whistleblowing please contact Nick or any member of our employment team.

 

About the author

Nick is a highly experienced employment lawyer with an exceptionally strong reputation in the City of London and beyond.

Employment disputes can be very stressful for all concerned and Nick combines both empathy and toughness as necessary. He is a tenacious litigator and a tough negotiator with particular expertise in dealing with complex issues involving any combinations of employment rights, share or other ownership-related rights and the rights and obligations of directors, officers and/or partners/LLP members.

See full profile

 

Latest blogs & news

Regulatory compliance, trust and confidence in the financial services sector

In a case that attracted national media coverage and emphasises the crucial importance of regulatory compliance and the highest standards of professional conduct in the financial services sector, the High Court dismissed a breach of contract claim brought by an investment manager.

Keeping the crypto market on its toes? The FCA publishes latest cryptoasset consumer research and takes regulatory action against Binance Markets Limited

For the fourth year the FCA has published research on the changing relationship between consumers and cryptoassets. In spite of the pandemic, the strong upward trend in public engagement and media coverage has continued, with the FCA estimating 2.3 million adults now hold cryptoassets.

The discontinuation of LIBOR and phasing in of SONIA in the Sterling Markets, what do we know so far?

Global financial markets are preparing to transition away from the use of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and adopt an appropriate alternative risk free rate (“RFR”) by the end of 2021. What are the reasons for the move away from LIBOR, the progress to date in terms of identifying the Sterling Overnight Index Average (“SONIA”) as the most appropriate alternative rate in the Sterling markets, and the steps still required to be taken to ensure such markets are ready for the phasing out of LIBOR by the end of the year

Breach of 2002 banking undertakings - the CMA writes to Danske Bank

At the end of last month, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) published a letter written to Danske Bank concerning its breach of the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (SME) Banking Behavioural Undertakings 2002, following loans it had offered under the ‘Bounce Back Loan Scheme’.

Time’s up: Deadline passes for crypto firms to register with the FCA

As of 10 January 2021, all cryptoasset firms are required to be registered with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) under the Money Laundering Regulations.

FCA sets expectations for firms to record communications when working from home

FCA focuses on risks associated with unmonitored communications, including the use of unencrypted apps, such as WhatsApp, for sharing potentially sensitive or confidential information when working from home.

First anniversary of the extension of the Senior Managers & Certification Regime

As we near the first anniversary of the extension of the Senior Managers & Certification Regime (SM&CR) to solo-regulated FCA firms, the first round of annual fitness and propriety assessments will be topping the to-do lists of many compliance professionals.

The Holiday is Over: Will the FCA’s efforts to support homeowners after the mortgage payment holiday be enough?

One of the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic is that national income has fallen dramatically. In response to concerns from homeowners unable to meet their mortgage repayment requirements due to a drop in income, the Treasury and Financial Conduct Authority announced a ‘mortgage payment holiday’. This was the result of banks agreeing to allow mortgage-holders suffering from a drop in income to pause their repayments. A ban on home repossessions was put in place at the same time

Non-financial misconduct is misconduct, plain and simple

The FCA announced on 5 November that it has banned three individuals from working in the financial services industry for non-financial misconduct.

Fitness and propriety investigations: practical considerations

How should regulated firms respond when issues come to light which call into question the fitness and propriety of a member of staff? In the second part of their series of fitness and propriety blogs, Jill Lorimer and Nick Ralph consider best practice. You can read the first part of the series by clicking here.

FCA issues new guidance on fitness and propriety assessments in the financial services sector

The Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) has recently provided information to their regulated firms as to good and bad practice relating to, amongst other things, the carrying out of fitness and propriety (“F&P”) assessments.

The new cryptoasset promotions consultation: widening the perimeter of FCA regulation

Research recently undertaken by the FCA has found that 5.35% of the UK population hold (or have previously held) cryptoassets where in 2019 this figure was 3%. For several years now the Government, the Bank of England and the FCA have been consulting on and considering how best to regulate this burgeoning market.

Inappropriate behaviour - when the past is not left in the past

The news that Stephen Jones, head of UK Finance, has quit over "thoroughly unpleasant" personal comments he made in 2008 about financier Amanda Staveley, is a stark reminder to executives that their past behaviour may one day come back to haunt them.

Who’d be a Whistle Blower?

The indications are that an increasing number of individuals are coming forward, particularly in the financial services sector, to call out wrongdoing.  

Your legal rights on returning to work during COVID-19

Whilst the prime minister's broadcast on 10 May did not open the floodgates to City employers requiring staff to "return to work" enmasse, most firms are already drawing up plans for how that should be organised and many of us will have been thinking about what will happen when employers start to update their 'work from home' advice.

Redundancy because of COVID-19 - top 10 tips for senior executives negotiating an exit

Coronavirus (COVID-19) is having an undeniably serious impact on businesses and the global economy. Everyone has been affected in some way.  Sadly, the looming financial crash means that many businesses have been impacted to the extent that they will have to put cost-cutting measures in place in the near and mid-term future.  For some individuals this will result in their role being put at risk of redundancy.

Partners' future under spotlight during crisis

In a startling opening to a recent Newsnight, presenter Emily Maitlis began with the words “They tell us Coronavirus is a great leveller. It’s not. It's much harder if you’re poor."

How can partners prepare for a post COVID-19 firm cull?

Partners need to do what they would advise their own clients to do: be well prepared.

Taking a pay cut - is it the right thing to do?

The moral arguments may well still apply but where salaries are less stellar, there may be more for an individual to lose on a relative basis and thornier issues to weigh on a practical level.

Legal rights if you're made to work in the office during COVID-19

While plenty of people in all sectors are now working from home, designated key workers in the financial services industry are still being forced to go to work.

Share insightLinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email to a friend Print

Email this page to a friend

We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.

Leave a comment

You may also be interested in:

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility