Getting Personal – Key Terms of a Personal Guarantee, What is it and When Should You Sign One?
Events of Default are most often found in the context of loan agreements and are similar to termination rights that may be found in commercial agreements, albeit with potentially different consequences. An Event of Default is an event or circumstance relating to a borrower or its activities which will give rise to a right for a lender to refuse to make any further advances, demand immediate repayment of a loan, make a term loan repayable on demand and/or enforce its security.
Below is a short borrower’s guide to navigating those Events of Default which are typically found in real estate finance documentation, and some tips on usual points of negotiation.
Common Events of Default in a real estate finance transaction:
If a borrower does not pay an amount when it becomes due under the loan agreement, this will constitute an Event of Default. Lenders are very unlikely to negotiate this. It may be possible for a borrower to seek to request the inclusion of a reasonable grace period within which the overdue amount must be paid, before the breach becomes an Event of Default. Ordinarily, such grace period would be no longer than a couple of business days.
A financial covenant is a promise by the borrower to meet and maintain an agreed financial position, during the term of the loan. In real estate finance transactions, financial covenants are usually linked to the market value of the underlying property and/or the level of income received from the property. For example, a ‘loan to value’ (or ‘LTV’) covenant will require the loan amount not to exceed a certain proportion of the market value of the property (based on the bank’s most recent valuation). Such covenants are most often tested on each interest payment date (or ‘IPD’) and any breach would trigger an Event of Default. Quite often a covenant breach is an early warning sign to a lender that a borrower may struggle to service the interest and/or repay the loan. The negotiation is likely to be around agreeing the threshold at which the borrower’s financial position becomes a breach and triggers an Event of Default. Quite often, cure rights are agreed to allow a borrower to ‘cure’ a covenant breach to avoid triggering an Event of Default.
In addition to breach of the payment clause and breach of financial covenant, a more general Event of Default will often be included to capture a breach of all other obligations of the borrower under the loan agreement such as breaches of undertakings. The borrower may wish to seek to limit the Event of Default to ‘material’ breaches and/or negotiate a grace period within which the breach can be remedied before the Event of Default arises. It is therefore important for the borrower to carefully consider all its obligations under the loan agreement, including in relation to any restrictions on its ability to deal with the property (such as in respect of leasing, disposal and development) and borrowing further monies from third party lenders. The various representations, warranties and undertakings may therefore need to be amended to ensure they do not hinder the smooth running of the borrower’s business, or obstruct its intentions for the property.
This Event of Default will be triggered if any representation or statement made (or deemed to have been made) by the borrower pursuant to the loan agreement (or sometimes also other, related finance documents), is shown to have been incorrect or misleading. The representations may be given on the date of the agreement only, or may also be deemed to be repeated on each day throughout the term of the loan (or certain dates such as drawdown dates, IPDs or the dates of any repayment or prepayment). The borrower could seek to limit the Event of Default by inserting some materiality wording so that the Event of Default only occurs when the misrepresentation only has a material effect on the borrower’s ability to fulfil its obligations under the loan agreement. The borrower will also want to ensure that the representations are limited to written statements in the loan agreement only, and not verbal discussions or other correspondence between the parties.
A cross-default Event of Default will be triggered if the borrower defaults under any another agreement, either with the lender or a separate third party. The borrower should therefore carefully consider what other agreements it has in place, and what the likelihood is of a default under the same. If necessary, the borrower could seek to insert some carve out language, exempting certain agreements from being captured by this provision. For example, it is quite common to see a de-minimus value included in respect of a default under another agreement. Borrowers should also be careful to ensure that the wording of this Event of Default does not preclude or otherwise hinder the efficient conduct of its business.
This Event of Default will almost always appear in a loan agreement in some form. Depending on the way it has been drafted, an Event of Default will be triggered when an insolvency situation (however it is defined in the loan agreement) has arisen in respect of the borrower. Sometimes simply the threat of an insolvency process being initiated against the borrower can be enough to trigger this Event of Default. As such, this provision can become quite heavily negotiated because the borrower will want to limit the meaning of an insolvency event as much as possible, whereas the lender is likely to want to have the ability to trigger an Event of Default and demand immediate repayment of the loan, at the first indication of the borrower being in any financial difficulty.
If a borrower becomes aware that an Event of Default has occurred or is likely to occur, it will usually be under an obligation to promptly notify the lender of the same and provide the relevant details including what steps, if any, have been taken to remedy any breach.
Following an Event of Default, the lender will have a number of options available to it, which will be set out in the ‘Acceleration’ clause of the loan agreement. These will typically include the ability to:
Following an Event of Default, the lender will not be under any particular obligation to exercise its rights under the Acceleration provisions, and it could agree to waive the Event of Default altogether.
The lender may choose to issue a ‘reservation of rights letter’ to the borrower following an Event of Default (or sometimes following breach of the loan agreement, but before the Event of Default has been triggered, (often known as a ‘Default’)). Under the reservation of rights letter, the lender will seek to reserve any rights or remedies it may have under the loan agreement in connection with an Event of Default (or breach), even if it hasn’t taken immediate or prompt action in relation to the same. This should avoid a situation arising whereby the borrower can argue that the lender has waived the Event of Default (or breach) and therefore protects the lender’s ability to take action, later.
Anna Shonfeld is an Associate in the Corporate and Commercial department. Anna has experience acting on a range of corporate matters including share sale and purchase transactions, advising on shareholders’ agreements and general commercial contract drafting.
You are aware that the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS) and the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) are two tax incentive schemes for individuals who invest in early-stage companies. What are the key considerations when determining whether a particular investment is eligible for SEIS/EIS relief?
In September 2020 the FCA published a statement regarding the listing of cannabis-related businesses (CRBs) in the UK. Since then several CRBs have been admitted to the London Stock Exchange (LSE) and appetite for investments in the medicinal cannabis industry continues to grow.
The FCA has launched a consultation on a technical note setting out guidance for companies applying for listing which have cannabis-related businesses. As with all companies applying for listing, those with cannabis related businesses must be assessed for eligibility for listing under the Listing Rules. Because of the legal complexities around cannabis businesses the FCA applies additional due diligence requirements to them.
The pandemic has changed the world – there is no doubt we are all “online” far more now than before. Social media now extends into every aspect of our lives, from those notorious repetitive baby pictures to those ‘should never have been posted university photos‘. We collect and share moments of our lives in the digital world.
Following the release of the Hill Report, the FCA has moved quickly to consult on proposals intended to provide an alternative route to market for larger Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (“SPACs”). The broad proposal is that if a SPAC can meet additional investor protection requirements the FCA will not generally require that the listing of its shares be suspended once an acquisition is announced.
Global financial markets are preparing to transition away from the use of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and adopt an appropriate alternative risk free rate (“RFR”) by the end of 2021. What are the reasons for the move away from LIBOR, the progress to date in terms of identifying the Sterling Overnight Index Average (“SONIA”) as the most appropriate alternative rate in the Sterling markets, and the steps still required to be taken to ensure such markets are ready for the phasing out of LIBOR by the end of the year
Following the release of the Hill Report at the start of last month, the FCA has announced that it is going to open a consultation into changing the Listing Rules and connected guidance with a view to encouraging the listing of Special Purpose Acquisition Vehicles (SPACs).
Lord Hill’s keenly awaited report on the UK’s listing regime was released on 3 March 2021. Many of his recommendations focus on the premium listed segment, and much of the commentary to date has focussed on recommendations such as permitting dual class share structures. However, the report includes a number of proposals which if implemented may make the Official List more appealing to smaller companies, which we have highlighted in this blog.
On 30 March 2021 the provisions of the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (“CIGA”) which allowed purely virtual general meetings will lapse, and the normal rules will apply. ICSA have produced some useful guidance to assist companies in dealing with their general meetings in the light of this change.
Following a request by the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (“BEIS”) ICSA has prepared a report assessing the effectiveness of the independent board evaluation process introduced in the 2018 update of the UK Corporate Governance Code (the “UK Code”).
What happens when a director commits fraud by misappropriating company assets? Or what of the director who continues trading knowing that the company has no realistic prospect of paying its debts as and when they fall due? To whom does a director owe duties at that point and what recourse is there against that director? This article explores these questions.
We have previously examined how the Government’s Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Schemes (the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS), Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) and Coronavirus Large Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CLBILS)(together the “Schemes”) work. A report issued by the Public Accounts Committee on 10 December 2020 highlights the darker side of the Schemes and what it is costing the UK taxpayer.
In the last instalment we talked about the ways in which the founders of KNow Wear Limited could protect the intellectual property in their business. Since then, the business has been progressing well and our founders have been working on developing a prototype.
Back in July Rishi Sunak requested a review of the current capital gains tax (CGT) system. The Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) was asked by Sunak to produce a report on whether certain features of CGT distort the behaviour of individuals.
In our last instalment our founders, Sarah and Chris, considered the basics in establishing their tech startup and they incorporated a company under the registered name ‘KNow Wear Limited’.
Welcome back to the blog series covering the lifecycle of a tech startup, from a legal perspective.
Alex (tech), Andy (tech), Emer (investments) and I (investments) work alongside startups and founders day to day and thought it might to helpful to some of you out there to bring together our expertise on the legal issues that tend to arise and how we deal with them.
As the June quarter date fast approaches and the economic impact of COVID-19 begins to be felt across all sectors, what steps should landlords be taking to vary their lease arrangements with tenants who are unable to meet their rental obligations, and could a reduction in rental income due to COVID-19 put landlords in breach of their own obligations under their loan facilities?
On sitting down to write this blog, I was a little embarrassed. When you actually take the time to think about drafting legal documents in a way that is gender neutral, it seems to me that the question isn’t why do this, but why not?
Company succession planning is critical to ensure that a company can continue to run in the unfortunate event that a director (or shareholder) dies. If there are other surviving directors, they are able to step in and run the company, but what happens when a sole company director dies?
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility