Getting Personal – Key Terms of a Personal Guarantee, What is it and When Should You Sign One?
Events of Default are most often found in the context of loan agreements and are similar to termination rights that may be found in commercial agreements, albeit with potentially different consequences. An Event of Default is an event or circumstance relating to a borrower or its activities which will give rise to a right for a lender to refuse to make any further advances, demand immediate repayment of a loan, make a term loan repayable on demand and/or enforce its security.
Below is a short borrower’s guide to navigating those Events of Default which are typically found in real estate finance documentation, and some tips on usual points of negotiation.
Common Events of Default in a real estate finance transaction:
If a borrower does not pay an amount when it becomes due under the loan agreement, this will constitute an Event of Default. Lenders are very unlikely to negotiate this. It may be possible for a borrower to seek to request the inclusion of a reasonable grace period within which the overdue amount must be paid, before the breach becomes an Event of Default. Ordinarily, such grace period would be no longer than a couple of business days.
A financial covenant is a promise by the borrower to meet and maintain an agreed financial position, during the term of the loan. In real estate finance transactions, financial covenants are usually linked to the market value of the underlying property and/or the level of income received from the property. For example, a ‘loan to value’ (or ‘LTV’) covenant will require the loan amount not to exceed a certain proportion of the market value of the property (based on the bank’s most recent valuation). Such covenants are most often tested on each interest payment date (or ‘IPD’) and any breach would trigger an Event of Default. Quite often a covenant breach is an early warning sign to a lender that a borrower may struggle to service the interest and/or repay the loan. The negotiation is likely to be around agreeing the threshold at which the borrower’s financial position becomes a breach and triggers an Event of Default. Quite often, cure rights are agreed to allow a borrower to ‘cure’ a covenant breach to avoid triggering an Event of Default.
In addition to breach of the payment clause and breach of financial covenant, a more general Event of Default will often be included to capture a breach of all other obligations of the borrower under the loan agreement such as breaches of undertakings. The borrower may wish to seek to limit the Event of Default to ‘material’ breaches and/or negotiate a grace period within which the breach can be remedied before the Event of Default arises. It is therefore important for the borrower to carefully consider all its obligations under the loan agreement, including in relation to any restrictions on its ability to deal with the property (such as in respect of leasing, disposal and development) and borrowing further monies from third party lenders. The various representations, warranties and undertakings may therefore need to be amended to ensure they do not hinder the smooth running of the borrower’s business, or obstruct its intentions for the property.
This Event of Default will be triggered if any representation or statement made (or deemed to have been made) by the borrower pursuant to the loan agreement (or sometimes also other, related finance documents), is shown to have been incorrect or misleading. The representations may be given on the date of the agreement only, or may also be deemed to be repeated on each day throughout the term of the loan (or certain dates such as drawdown dates, IPDs or the dates of any repayment or prepayment). The borrower could seek to limit the Event of Default by inserting some materiality wording so that the Event of Default only occurs when the misrepresentation only has a material effect on the borrower’s ability to fulfil its obligations under the loan agreement. The borrower will also want to ensure that the representations are limited to written statements in the loan agreement only, and not verbal discussions or other correspondence between the parties.
A cross-default Event of Default will be triggered if the borrower defaults under any another agreement, either with the lender or a separate third party. The borrower should therefore carefully consider what other agreements it has in place, and what the likelihood is of a default under the same. If necessary, the borrower could seek to insert some carve out language, exempting certain agreements from being captured by this provision. For example, it is quite common to see a de-minimus value included in respect of a default under another agreement. Borrowers should also be careful to ensure that the wording of this Event of Default does not preclude or otherwise hinder the efficient conduct of its business.
This Event of Default will almost always appear in a loan agreement in some form. Depending on the way it has been drafted, an Event of Default will be triggered when an insolvency situation (however it is defined in the loan agreement) has arisen in respect of the borrower. Sometimes simply the threat of an insolvency process being initiated against the borrower can be enough to trigger this Event of Default. As such, this provision can become quite heavily negotiated because the borrower will want to limit the meaning of an insolvency event as much as possible, whereas the lender is likely to want to have the ability to trigger an Event of Default and demand immediate repayment of the loan, at the first indication of the borrower being in any financial difficulty.
If a borrower becomes aware that an Event of Default has occurred or is likely to occur, it will usually be under an obligation to promptly notify the lender of the same and provide the relevant details including what steps, if any, have been taken to remedy any breach.
Following an Event of Default, the lender will have a number of options available to it, which will be set out in the ‘Acceleration’ clause of the loan agreement. These will typically include the ability to:
Following an Event of Default, the lender will not be under any particular obligation to exercise its rights under the Acceleration provisions, and it could agree to waive the Event of Default altogether.
The lender may choose to issue a ‘reservation of rights letter’ to the borrower following an Event of Default (or sometimes following breach of the loan agreement, but before the Event of Default has been triggered, (often known as a ‘Default’)). Under the reservation of rights letter, the lender will seek to reserve any rights or remedies it may have under the loan agreement in connection with an Event of Default (or breach), even if it hasn’t taken immediate or prompt action in relation to the same. This should avoid a situation arising whereby the borrower can argue that the lender has waived the Event of Default (or breach) and therefore protects the lender’s ability to take action, later.
Anna Shonfeld is an Associate in the Corporate and Commercial department. Anna has experience acting on a range of corporate matters including share sale and purchase transactions, advising on shareholders’ agreements and general commercial contract drafting.
KNow Wear Limited has used the investment received to date to further develop the wearable tech product to the extent that it now has a minimum viable product with basic features to introduce to the market. The company has identified a test group of 100 consumers who will test this version of the product and provide feedback. Following the test phase the company will collate the feedback and further develop the product before releasing a final version of the product to the market.
The Government has for some time promised to introduce a register requiring overseas entities holding UK property to identify its beneficial owners, in its effort to increase transparency in UK property ownership and reduce the attraction of the UK’s property market to money launderers. Indeed, we last blogged about the potential overseas entities register in May 2019. With UK-based entities subject to strict information-sharing requirements since 2016 (in the form of the register of People with Significant Control or “PSC Register”), many have been calling for an equivalent overseas entities register to be implemented to provide a way of tracking overseas owners who ultimately own and control UK land.
In an Employment Related Securities (ERS) Bulletin for March 2022 (bulletin 40), HMRC has linked to helpful guidance on what it considers to be a reasonable excuse for failing to meet submission deadlines for annual ERS returns (due on 6th July following the end of the tax year to which they relate) and notification of EMI options (due within 92 days after grant).
In our recent blog, we explored why a Framework Agreement structure is typically the most appropriate customer contracting model for IT managed services providers (“MSPs”) and IT consultancies which offer a diverse product and service offering. Whilst our initial blog focussed on the purpose and terms of the Framework Agreement itself, that document is merely the starting point, given that a Work Order is also needed to document specific terms relating to each product or service offered by an MSP or IT consultancy. A typical service offering is a dedicated software support helpdesk, usually provided to support each of the software products offered by the MSP or IT consultancy to its customers. This blog considers a handful of the key issues to bear in mind when documenting the terms of a Work Order relating to the supply of a software support helpdesk service.
Articles are a set of rules which determine how a private company is run and they represent a contract not only between the company and its shareholders but also between the shareholders themselves. Examples of what is covered in a company’s Articles include the liability of shareholders, how shareholders make decisions and how directors operate. The Model Articles are a set of default standard articles which, unless modified or excluded, apply automatically to a private company incorporated on or after 1 October 2009.
Picture Rishi Sunak as a game show host. The spotlight is on the contestant, an employee, and Rishi asks them if they would like to: a) Keep their pay rise; b) give it all to the government; or c) give it all to charity. I expect many of us would say “Keep it please!” but, in certain situations, without some action on the employee’s part the default answer is that none of it is kept and the government enjoys it all. This post briefly discusses one such issue, and offers other suggestions for the tax year end (which are, unfortunately, unlikely to make you a millionaire).
Despite the rumours of a reduction in income tax, you may have expected that the Chancellor would keep this in his back pocket for now...
KNow Wear Limited have identified some overseas talent that they would like to hire to help to expand the business. This candidate does not currently have permission to work in the UK and therefore KNow Wear Limited is considering whether it can apply for a sponsor licence from UK Visas & Immigration (“UKVI”). Obtaining a sponsor licence, will then enable the company to go on and sponsor individuals to apply for immigration permission to work in the UK.
The FCA has published its proposals to strengthen the financial promotion rules for high-risk investments and for authorised firms which communicate and approve financial promotions in its recent Consultation Paper.
Many businesses lack comprehensive in-house IT expertise and resources to fully implement and manage all of their IT infrastructure requirements. IT managed services providers (“MSPs”) and IT consultancies plug the gaps by typically offering a diverse range of IT services and products to lighten the burden on their customers’ in-house IT teams (or to even remove the need to have an in-house IT team).
Having raised £500,000 and, in episode 8, hired a software developer, KNow Wear Limited is starting to flourish. As Ben Franklin wrote when the USA was in its infancy, nothing is certain except death and taxes. Knowledge of the UK tax system is valuable for any UK business owner, start-ups can dramatically improve their chances of success by ensuring they claim the various tax reliefs and incentives available. Episode 4 looked at the valuable tax reliefs a company can offer its investors, your focus today is on the tax relief (or repayment) available to companies carrying out research and development activities.
Social media has revolutionised the way in which we interact with businesses and each other and has shown that it can be a generous friend to business owners and entrepreneurs, helping them to harness a following, build their brand and grow a worldwide customer base.
In our previous blog in our Lifecycle of a tech startup series, KNow Wear Limited secured investment of £500,000. Having completed the raise, you, Sarah and Chris have decided that you need more help in developing and marketing the product. You are looking to create two new roles in the business - the first is a Software Developer to support Sarah’s work and the second is a Head of Marketing.
In Part 1 of our two-part series on the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy's (BEIS) White Paper on audit and corporate governance reform (Restoring Trust in Audit and Corporate Governance), we focussed on whether the proposals regarding corporate governance are likely to make the UK a more or less attractive destination for investors.
Yesterday the FCA announced new rules, the majority of which come into force today (3 December 2021), which are intended to prevent smaller companies obtaining admissions to the Standard Segment of the Official List.
In its Perimeter Report for 2020/21 the FCA has raised concerns that unauthorised persons are increasingly using, or purporting to use, exemptions from the Financial Promotions Order (FPO) to sell high risk investments and potential scams to ordinary consumers without their rules applying.
Potential reforms to UK data privacy laws will change the way that cookies work on websites - businesses need to prepare now.
AQSE is consulting the market about some changes to its rules relating to SPAC admissions.
Currently SPACs are eligible for admission to the Access segment of the AQSE growth market, as long as they have a minimum capitalisation of £700,000 and a free float of 10%. AQSE is concerned that this can result in a disorderly market and excessive volatility because a lack of liquidity arising from low market capitalisation and limited shareholder numbers.
Having decided in episode 4 of our lifecycle of a tech startup series on targeting angel investors to raise £500,000 investment in the business, the founders of KNow Wear Limited researched various angel investor networks which aimed to connect start-ups like yours with angel investors. You applied to pitch at a couple of events and were invited by one network to interview with them in person. The network was very impressed with the business and invited you to pitch at their next event.
In 2012, as a recently elected MP, Kwasi Kwarteng co-authored “Britannia Unchained: Global Lessons for Growth and Properity”, a political pamphlet which championed risk-taking and innovation in the UK economy, and which ever since has led some to label him a fervent Brexiteer. Appointed as the Business Secretary in January 2021, only a few months later his department (BEIS) published one of the longest and most ambitious government White Papers in recent years.
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility