Blog and infographic
The A-Z of secured lending
Anthony Macpherson
You would have to be living under a rock not to recognise that environmental issues have become much more of a focus in recent years as ‘going green’ has become a greater priority for everyone, both at an individual level (think tote bags, keep cups and paper straws) and at a corporate level too, as many sectors and organisations make environmental, social and governance (or, “ESG”) criteria, a higher priority.
The lending market has been no exception to this and in December 2018, the Loan Market Association (the “LMA”), together with the Asia Pacific Loan Market Association (“APLMA”) and the Loan Syndication and Trading Association (“LSTA”)) launched its guidance on ‘Green Loan’ principles. In March 2019, the LMA (together with ALPMA and LSTA) also published its ‘Sustainability Linked Loan’ principles.
This blog provides a broad overview of the differences between Green Loans and Sustainability Linked Loans, and considers the extent to which green lending may contribute to a greener planet for everyone (if at all).
The key defining feature of a Green Loan is how the proceeds of the loan are to be used by the borrower. To qualify as a Green Loan, the proceeds must be used in whole or in part for ‘Green Projects’ which provide a clear environmental benefit.
The guidance as to what constitutes a ‘Green Project’ is fairly broad, with the Green Loan principles providing wide reaching categories for eligibility purposes including projects relating to renewable energy, energy efficiency, clean transportation, sustainable water, wastewater management, eco-efficient products and green buildings.
The way in which the proceeds of the loan are used is key to a Green Loan, but the Green Loan borrower should also provide appropriate information to the relevant finance parties in respect of its process, project evaluation and ultimate selection of its green projects. This may include providing details of its environmental sustainability objectives more generally, and the process by which it has considered that its projects fit within the Green Projects eligibility criteria.
The borrower should also manage the proceeds of the Green Loan appropriately by crediting the same into a dedicated Green Loan account and properly tracking how the proceeds are used. If the Green Loan will only comprise one tranche of a loan, then the green tranche must be clearly designated as such, and deposited into a separate account.
Finally, the Green Loan borrower should maintain appropriate records to identify and monitor how the Green Loan (or green tranche) has been used and the expected environmental impact. Such information should then be included in the borrower’s regular reporting.
In some circumstances, it may be appropriate for a Green Loan to be reviewed and rated externally by qualified third parties such as an independent ESG rating provider.
Sustainability Linked Loans are different to Green Loans. The key feature of a Sustainability Linked Loan is that the borrower is incentivised to meet certain pre-determined sustainability performance targets (“SPTs”), rather than being obligated to use the proceeds of the loan in a specific way. Unlike a Green Loan, the purpose of a Sustainability Linked Loan may simply be for general corporate purposes.
Examples of SPTs categories are set out in the Sustainability Linked Loan principles and include improvements in the energy efficiency of buildings or machinery, reductions in greenhouse gasses, increasing the number of affordable housing units, improving its own ESG rating and the achievement of a recognised ESG certification.
Sustainability Linked Loans will often incentivise the borrower by linking the attainment of the agreed SPTs (which the Sustainability Linked Loan principles say should be “ambitious and meaningful to the borrower’s business”), to the terms of the loan. For example, the lender(s) may be entitled to increase or reduce the interest rate margin during the term of the loan, depending on whether the pre-agreed SPTs have been met. The intention is to encourage the borrower to engage in ambitious and positive change itself, thereby contributing to environmentally and socially sustainable economic activity and growth, more widely.
Similarly to the position in relation to Green Loans, a Sustainability Linked Loan borrower should expect to provide detailed information relating to their SPTs, and report on the same at least annually to the relevant finance parties. As with a Green Loan borrower, they may also be reviewed and rated by a third party ESG rating provider.
The LMA is reporting continued growth in the green and sustainability linked loan market, which reported a volume of $99bn in 2018. This aligns with the clear social and cultural shift towards greater engagement with environmental and sustainability issues in recent years, together with the introduction of number of climate change and corporate governance initiatives on national and international levels.
The introduction of the Green Loan principles and Sustainability Linked Loan principles have helped provide this expanding market with a framework of standard guidelines which should help provide some consistency as the market continues to grow and keep any ‘green washing’ criticism, at bay (‘green washing’ is a term used to describe the process of simply utilising clever marketing and PR tactics to give the impression of an (unsubstantiated) environmentally or sustainability based approach to business activities).
The green lending market is still its relative infancy (by way of comparison, the first set of Green Bond principles were launched in January 2014) and so it is difficult to comment on whether the recent expansion in the Green Loans and Sustainability Linked Loans market will genuinely encourage more environmentally and socially sustainable economic activity.
Some may argue that, on the basis the loan market itself is setting its own guidelines and principles as to what constitutes sustainable activity, this could lead to softer ‘Green Projects’ criteria and SPTs than are really required to see any tangible change. There is also an argument that the concept of Sustainability Linked Loans may not go far enough on the basis that they only require the borrower to make improvements to its sustainable activity but could still be made available to organisations operating in an environmentally damaging sector. However, the fact that steps are now being taken to properly address sustainability and environmental issues within the loan market, is surely a step in the right direction.
Founders and teams across the country are looking for signals that the UK still backs its innovators. Here’s what’s top of the wish-list:
For founders, investors and anyone involved in the tech sector, understanding who owns your software and how to prove it is critical. Whether you’re seeking investment, planning an exit or simply aiming to protect your IP, clarity on ownership can make or break a deal
The Court of Appeal has recently handed down an important decision in respect of data protection law considerations in Farley & Others v Paymaster (trading as Equiniti) [2025] EWCA Civ 1117, providing clarity on the scope of infringement and compensation data protection claims under the UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 (“DPA”). The judgment will be of particular interest to any service provider dealing with and processing large volumes of customer personal data.
At some point in their history, businesses commonly have need for external funding to help their growth trajectory.
In tech, the law often arrives after something has gone wrong. Here are three cautionary tales* and the lessons every founder, CTO and in-house counsel should take away.
The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (the “DUAA”), which received Royal Assent on 19 June 2025, introduces targeted reforms to the UK data protection legal framework — particularly the UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018, and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 (“PECR”).
Many of you will know that the Government published, on 23 June, its Modern Industrial Strategy paper and, with it, committed to creating a “predictable, proportionate, and transparent investment screening framework” and launching a 12-week consultation on updating the definitions of the 17 sensitive sectors of the economy as set out in the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (NSIA).
The recent cyberattacks on major UK retailers have put cybersecurity back in the spotlight. But a more significant development for data protection practitioners has been flying under the radar: the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued a notable fine directly against a data processor for breaching UK GDPR security obligations - an important shift in enforcement focus.
The 2023/24 tax year marks a major shift in the way unincorporated businesses are taxed. It is a transition year, with HMRC moving from the traditional “current year basis” to a “tax year basis” from 6 April 2024. While this change is intended to simplify the system in the long run, it introduces some short-term complexities (and often tax expense) during the transition year which partners and other sole traders ought to be alive to.
We have a wealth of experience acting for high net worth individuals at the outset of their angel investing journey and for seasoned angel investors who need the occasional bit of legal input.
On 6 April 2025, the first wave of consumer protection provisions under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (“DMCC Act”) came into force, marking the most significant overhaul of UK consumer protection law in over a decade.
In the wake of recent high-profile cyber-attacks on major retailers like Marks & Spencer and Co-op, the UK government has launched a new voluntary Code of Practice for software vendors at its flagship cyber security event, CyberUK 2025. This initiative sets a dynamic baseline for software security and resilience, aiming to help prevent such breaches in the future.
The Office of Communications, commonly known as ‘Ofcom’ (the regulator for communication services) is calling on tech firms to make ‘the online world safer for women and girls’.
Criminal risk isn’t the first thing that comes to mind when considering the commercial drivers behind a merger or acquisition. But our recent roundtable discussion at our offices made clear that criminal liability—however peripheral it might seem—can have very real consequences for deal viability and post-completion exposure. Here are five key takeaways from a discussion that brought together legal and business perspectives on how economic crime intersects with transactional work.
In this blog, we dive into the essentials of share buybacks, explore common issues that arise when shareholders object, and uncover creative workarounds to navigate conflicts while staying compliant and maintaining trust.
Last week, I had the pleasure of hosting an insightful roundtable dinner at The Ivy in Covent Garden, London, bringing together thought leaders, industry experts, and business owners to discuss one of the most pressing topics of our time - AI regulation. Co-hosted by the brilliant Fred Becker, CAO of Unlikely AI, the conversation was rich with diverse perspectives, practical concerns and strategic insights.
In business sales and acquisitions, managing risk is not just important – it is essential for a smooth and successful transaction. One of the most powerful tools to mitigate these risks is warranty and indemnity (“W&I”) insurance. W&I insurance provides vital protection for both buyers and sellers against unforeseen liabilities that may arise after the deal is completed.
The EU Data Act is set to reshape the data landscape, and while its full impact will unfold over time, some key provisions are coming into effect this September that SaaS providers need to be aware of now. Specifically, we're talking about the rules around data switching, and how they'll likely require you to update your standard terms and existing customer agreements.
The Cabinet Office has published a report following the government's first statutory review of the performance of the Notifiable Acquisition regulations (NARs), the statutory instrument which sets out the detail of the 17 specified sectors of the economy subject to mandatory notification requirements under the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (NSIA).
At midnight on 30 October 2023, while many of us slept in eager anticipation of the new labour government’s first budget, the rate of Capital Gains Tax (CGT) increased. 12 hours later the Chancellor announced the higher rate of CGT had increased by 4%. The hike is less drastic than feared and seems unlikely to cause sellers too many sleepless nights.
Anthony Macpherson
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print