Blog
HMRC Covid scheme amnesty: action by 31 December 2025
Waqar Shah
Developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), CARF establishes a mechanism for the automatic exchange of tax-related information on crypto-asset activities between participating jurisdictions. It mirrors existing frameworks but is tailored specifically for digital assets, with the aim of preventing crypto being used to hide taxable income, or undermine steps taken towards global tax transparency.
Under CARF, those involved in facilitating transactions, exchanges, or the holding of digital assets on behalf of clients will be required to report certain customer transaction data to tax authorities. This will enable governments to track crypto activity and enforce tax compliance more effectively. For more information on CARF, see here.
The CARF agreement does not introduce new taxes on crypto in the UAE. However, it does mean that:
It is important for crypto investors to obtain specialist advice and ensure that they are tax compliant in both the country they reside in, and any other country in which they have crypto investments or may otherwise be liable for tax. Information exchanges that indicate non-compliance with tax obligations can give rise to investigations concerning previous tax years, so consideration should be given to whether a voluntary report should be made to tax authorities regarding any unpaid tax to minimise penalties that may be payable to HMRC.
Should you wish to discuss, please contact Waqar Shah or Krishna Mahajan.
The English High Court, in Mr Dollar Bill Limited v Persons Unknown and Others [2021] EWHC 2718 (Ch), has once again come to the rescue for victims of fraud – this time armed with a Norwich Pharmacal Order to be served outside the jurisdiction.
A Civil Fraud quarterly round-up (4th quarter 2021)
Rebecca Niblock and Mary Young follow on from an article they wrote in September 2020 about whether there should be a right to banking, and the possibly unintended consequences of banking facilities being withdrawn or frozen.
We have previously examined how the Government’s Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Schemes (the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS), Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) and Coronavirus Large Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CLBILS)(together the “Schemes”) work. A report issued by the Public Accounts Committee on 10 December 2020 highlights the darker side of the Schemes and what it is costing the UK taxpayer.
Accounting firms should be bracing themselves for a rise in professional negligence claims as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.
The current global pandemic has provided and will continue to provide plentiful opportunities for fraud and opportunism.
There has been much mention in the press in recent times about the amount of allegedly incorrect or fraudulent claims made by employers under the Government’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (“CJRS”) (furlough scheme).
A search order, made pursuant to section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act 1997 and CPR Part 25, is one of the most draconian orders the English civil courts can make. No Respondent really wants a search team to enter their premises but because of Covid -19 the search team is even less welcome than usual.
It has been widely reported that fraudsters are currently seeking to exploit the situation with COVID-19. Alarmingly, Action Fraud reported an increase in coronavirus related fraud by 400% in March. In this blog we outline some of the critical questions, which all charities, irrespective of size and stature, should be asking themselves to identify areas of risk and detect fraud and how to best respond if the charity has been a victim of fraud.
The legal profession is increasingly reliant on technology, and never more so than during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many clients are wondering what impact the restrictions on our movement will have on their upcoming mediations.
On 8 April 2020, GCHQ’s National Cyber Security Centre and the US Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency published a joint advisory about a rise in cybercrime related to the Covid-19 pandemic.
The self-isolation and social distancing bought about as a result of the coronavirus pandemic leaves the elderly and incapacitated even more vulnerable to financial abuse. It is has been well reported that fraudsters are seeking to take advantage of the current situation whether via the internet, on the phone or in person but it also seems likely that this period will sadly see a rise in abuse of power of attorney by those closer to home.
Last week and, again, on Saturday 25 March 2020, the government announced plans to introduce changes to current insolvency laws to ease pressures on UK businesses being caused by the global pandemic, COVID19. See latest announcement here.
We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.
Or call +44 (0)20 7814 1200
Waqar Shah
Waqar Shah
Waqar Shah
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print