Services A-Z     Pricing

UAE agrees to share crypto information with international tax authorities

13 October 2025

The United Arab Emirates (“UAE”) has joined in global efforts to improve transparency and compliance in the crypto sector by signing the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement (MCAA) under the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF). The framework is expected to be rolled out in UAE in 2027, with the first automatic exchanges of information with other tax authorities such as HMRC taking place in 2028.
 

What Is CARF?


Developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), CARF establishes a mechanism for the automatic exchange of tax-related information on crypto-asset activities between participating jurisdictions. It mirrors existing frameworks but is tailored specifically for digital assets, with the aim of preventing crypto being used to hide taxable income, or undermine steps taken towards global tax transparency. 

Under CARF, those involved in facilitating transactions, exchanges, or the holding of digital assets on behalf of clients will be required to report certain customer transaction data to tax authorities. This will enable governments to track crypto activity and enforce tax compliance more effectively. For more information on CARF, see here.

Implications for those investing in crypto in the UAE and crypto firms
 

The CARF agreement does not introduce new taxes on crypto in the UAE. However, it does mean that:

  • Foreign investors living in the UAE but tax-resident elsewhere may have their crypto activity reported to their home tax authorities. For example, if you are tax resident in the UK but invest in crypto activity in the UAE – HMRC may be notified of your activity. The same will apply in the other signatory countries. So far almost 70 countries have signed or expressed an intention to sign up to the framework.
  • UAE-based platforms will face an increased administrative burden as they will need to implement stricter KYC and AML procedures and to comply with reporting obligations.
  • Privacy-focused investors may face reduced anonymity and increased compliance costs.

Conclusion
 

It is important for crypto investors to obtain specialist advice and ensure that they are tax compliant in both the country they reside in, and any other country in which they have crypto investments or may otherwise be liable for tax. Information exchanges that indicate non-compliance with tax obligations can give rise to investigations concerning previous tax years, so consideration should be given to whether a voluntary report should be made to tax authorities regarding any unpaid tax to minimise penalties that may be payable to HMRC.

Should you wish to discuss, please contact Waqar Shah or Krishna Mahajan.

Latest blogs & news

The English Court: A Fraudster’s Crypto-nite

The English High Court, in Mr Dollar Bill Limited v Persons Unknown and Others [2021] EWHC 2718 (Ch), has once again come to the rescue for victims of fraud – this time armed with a Norwich Pharmacal Order to be served outside the jurisdiction.

Civil Fraud Quarterly Round-Up: Q4 2021

A Civil Fraud quarterly round-up (4th quarter 2021)

‘De-risking’ and financial exclusion

Rebecca Niblock and Mary Young follow on from an article they wrote in September 2020 about whether there should be a right to banking, and the possibly unintended consequences of banking facilities being withdrawn or frozen.

£26 billion fraud: The other side of the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Schemes

We have previously examined how the Government’s Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Schemes (the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS), Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) and Coronavirus Large Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CLBILS)(together the “Schemes”) work. A report issued by the Public Accounts Committee on 10 December 2020 highlights the darker side of the Schemes and what it is costing the UK taxpayer. 

Firms brace for negligence impact

Accounting firms should be bracing themselves for a rise in professional negligence claims as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Fraud and opportunism during COVID-19

The current global pandemic has provided and will continue to provide plentiful opportunities for fraud and opportunism.

Insolvency and furlough fraud – directors beware!

There has been much mention in the press in recent times about the amount of allegedly incorrect or fraudulent claims made by employers under the Government’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (“CJRS”) (furlough scheme).

Court makes Search Order in COVID times

A search order, made pursuant to section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act 1997 and CPR Part 25, is one of the most draconian orders the English civil courts can make.  No Respondent really wants a search team to enter their premises but because of Covid -19 the search team is even less welcome than usual.

How to guard against and respond to fraud in the charity sector

It has been widely reported that fraudsters are currently seeking to exploit the situation with COVID-19. Alarmingly, Action Fraud reported an increase in coronavirus related fraud by 400% in March. In this blog we outline some of the critical questions, which all charities, irrespective of size and stature, should be asking themselves to identify areas of risk and detect fraud and how to best respond if the charity has been a victim of fraud.

Remote mediation in civil litigation: Does it really work?

The legal profession is increasingly reliant on technology, and never more so than during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many clients are wondering what impact the restrictions on our movement will have on their upcoming mediations. 

US and UK cybersecurity agencies publish a joint statement warning of a rise in Covid-related cybercrime

On 8 April 2020, GCHQ’s National Cyber Security Centre and the US Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency published a joint advisory about a rise in cybercrime related to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Abuse of Power of Attorney: the importance of staying vigilant in the current COVID-19 climate

The self-isolation and social distancing bought about as a result of the coronavirus pandemic leaves the elderly and incapacitated even more vulnerable to financial abuse. It is has been well reported that fraudsters are seeking to take advantage of the current situation whether via the internet, on the phone or in person but it also seems likely that this period will sadly see a rise in abuse of power of attorney by those closer to home.

Alok Sharma shakes up insolvency laws

Last week and, again, on Saturday 25 March 2020, the government announced plans to introduce changes to current insolvency laws to ease pressures on UK businesses being caused by the global pandemic, COVID19. See latest announcement here.

Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print

Email this page to a friend

We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.

Leave a comment

Contact us today

Get in touch

Or call +44 (0)20 7814 1200

You may also be interested in:

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility