Blog
Deepfakes to Deletion Orders: Tackling technology enabled sexual offending in the Crime and Policing Act 2026
Sophie Tang
Since its launch in 2008, Airbnb has gone on to be one of the defining figures in what has come to be known as the “sharing economy”. But with this increased presence and power, comes greater responsibility and Airbnb are under increasing pressure to uphold and also enforce current laws regulating the short-term rental market.
Airbnb has become a worldwide platform for home owners to generate an extra income stream. The ability to jet away on a tropical holiday and let your home out for a fee or (for those fortunate enough to own more than one home) to let out your additional homes at short term intervals, is certainly attractive. However, whether or not such lettings are legal, or whether they breach any covenants restricting the property, is rarely considered when listing for Airbnb.
On 1st December 2016 the Government introduced provisions 39, 40 and 41 of the Immigration Act 2016 targeting residential landlords who fail to comply with their right to rent obligations. The reason for carrying out these checks is because they give the landlord a statutory excuse against a civil penalty (a fine) if it later turns out that the person does not have permission to be in the UK.
P&P Property Limited –v– (1) Owen White & Catlin LLP (2) Crownvent Limited t/a Winkworth [2016] EWHC 2276 (Ch):
This case serves as a welcome decision for professionals when considering where to pin the blame (and liability) in circumstances where a vendor in a property transaction turns out to be fraudulently impersonating the true owner.
Sophie Tang
Louise Hodges
Jemma Garside
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility