Blog
Kingsley Napley’s Medical Negligence Team ‘walks together’ with the Dame Vera Lynn Children’s Charity
Sharon Burkill
This point was addressed in the recent case of Donelien v Liberata UK Ltd. The employee had a very poor attendance record and cited as reasons for her absence a plethora of different conditions, ranging from viral infections to wrist pain to stress and anxiety. Liberata referred her to its Occupational Health service. Occupational Health, on two occasions, failed to address the specific questions Liberata put to it, and Liberata did not follow up further. However, Liberata did conduct a number of return to work meetings, engaged with the employee regarding the reasons for her absence and reviewed correspondence from the employee’s GP. The employee was dismissed for unsatisfactory attendance.
It has long been accepted that the Vento guidelines, which were later updated in Da’Bell, should be used in assessing the level of injury to feelings awards in relation to discrimination cases brought in the Employment Tribunal. However in the case of Simmons v Castle, the Court of Appeal held that the level of general damages in certain types of claims should be increased by 10% after 1 April 2013. So does this principle apply to injury to feelings awards made by the Employment Tribunal?
This point was addressed in the recent case of Donelien v Liberata UK Ltd. The employee had a very poor attendance record and cited as reasons for her absence a plethora of different conditions, ranging from viral infections to wrist pain to stress and anxiety. Liberata referred her to its Occupational Health service. Occupational Health, on two occasions, failed to address the specific questions Liberata put to it, and Liberata did not follow up further. However, Liberata did conduct a number of return to work meetings, engaged with the employee regarding the reasons for her absence and reviewed correspondence from the employee’s GP. The employee was dismissed for unsatisfactory attendance.
In Metroline Travel Ltd v Stoute, the Claimant argued that because he suffered from Type 2 diabetes, he was automatically disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. The Tribunal accepted the Claimant’s argument and the Respondent appealed to the EAT.
Public holidays can be very tricky when trying to work out part-time and casual staff's wages fairly, so here is a quick guide to do some of the work for you.
This blog was first published on www.growthbusiness.co.uk.
Sharon Burkill
Natalie Cohen
Rebecca Niblock
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility