Filton Pavier

Associate

+44 (0)20 7369 3834 fpavier@kingsleynapley.co.uk

Our People

Filton is an Associate in the Dispute Resolution team at Kingsley Napley, having completed his training contract at the firm.

His experience spans a range of complex matters, including civil fraud claims, contractual, company, boardroom and shareholder disputes, and professional negligence claims.

Filton acts for both corporate and individual clients in domestic and cross-border disputes.

Areas of expertise:

+44 (0)20 7369 3834 fpavier@kingsleynapley.co.uk Download vCard

Recent experience

Acted for an claimant in a commercial dispute arising out of a breached joint venture agreement
Acted for an overseas company in respect bringing a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation
Acted for individual in defending against a complex claim involving allegations of fraud and hacking
Acting in a variety of debt recovery matters, including taking enforcement action
Acting for claimants and defendants in a variety of commercial disputes

Professional Societies & Memberships

Young Fraud Lawyers Association
London Solicitors Litigation Association

Further information

Filton read Law with International Study at the University of Exeter, which included studying a year abroad in Singapore.

Filton achieved a distinction in the LPC with a Masters in Professional Legal Practice from the University of Law.

Learn More

Professional Negligence International and cross-border disputes International Arbitration Civil Fraud and Investigations Restructuring and Insolvency

Filton Pavier

About Filton

Recent experience

Professional Societies & Memberships

Further information

Learn More

Insights from Filton

A Tangled Web: Director ties himself in knots, then loses summary judgment battle in breach of duty claim

Broker negligence and loss of chance – Norman Hay PLC v Marsh Ltd

Fiduciary duties in bloom for crypto-developers

Share Buybacks: Tackling Challenges and Managing Dissent

What are ‘Never Events’?

Witness Statements under PD 57AC – The court’s approach to non-compliance