30 July 2026

Kingsley Napley’s Inheritance Tax Leaderboard

| Press Release | James Ward

Where people currently pay the most inheritance tax by local authority….and how Andy Burnham may change that

An analysis by law firm Kingsley Napley of HMRC inheritance tax data just released for tax year 2023-24 shows the geographical dispersal of estates hit by inheritance tax bills.

Based on the latest HMRC figures (published this morning) of inheritance tax paying estates, Kingsley Napley can reveal:

  • By total amount of inheritance tax paid, Kensington topped the leaderboard (again) by contributing £107m to the Government’s coffers (down from £154m last year), followed by the Cities of London & Westminster and Richmond Park localities.
  • By volume of estates paying inheritance tax, Esher & Walton had the highest number of estates affected (up from third place last year), followed by Richmond Park and Chichester for the year in question.
  • In terms of constituencies in the north, Harrogate & Knaresborough paid the most IHT (£53m) and Tatton had the most estates by number paying IHT (69).
  • The top 20 localities paying the most IHT were all in London and the South East except for Edinburgh South (which ranked 13th ) with 103 estates paying £41m and South West Hertfordshire (ranking 18th) and Brentwood & Ongar (ranking 20th) in the East paying £37m and £36m respectively.

Today’s data also shows that the total number of UK deaths that resulted in an IHT charge in 2023 to 2024 was 30,400, down 3.6% on 2022-2023. However IHT tax liabilities for the tax year 2023 to 2024 were £7.03 billion up £0.33bn (5%) compared to the previous year.  The average amount of IHT paid across all taxpaying estates increased by 9% (£19,000) between the tax years 2022 to 2023 and 2023 to 2024, and now stands at £231,000.

James Ward, Head of the Private Client Practice at Kingsley Napley, comments:

“As usual, London and South-East constituencies top our leaderboard but the bigger picture is that more and more estates across the country were dragged into the IHT net for the year in question largely due to the fact tax bands have been stuck since 2009. 

For the last decade, of course, house price growth has been the primary driver of the year on year increased IHT haul but that may be about to change. The decision to make pensions subject to IHT from 2027 may well be a significant contributor to the tax take in future given it is expected this change will add approximately 10,500 more estates to HMRC’s sights.

The big question, however, is what further changes to our inheritance tax regime are on the horizon under new PM Andy Burnham. Some are speculating he may abolish inheritance tax altogether in favour of a flat levy on all estates to fund social care reforms. Others think he may introduce this on top of the current regime and in addition to other property or land tax measures.

We also know that various options remain open to him in terms of tweaks to the current IHT regime without breaking manifesto pledges. Reform of the gifting rules, use of the IHT nil rate band or residence nil rate band and removal of capital gains tax uplift on death for example are changes Rachel Reeves supposedly considered and could still be on the cards.

As I have said before, IHT is our wealth tax in this country and if it disappears, the alternative could be far worse. However, we have still seen a huge uptick in inquiries in recent months from families wanting to protect their wealth as far as possible from potential changes.

There is still a window to plan mitigation steps before Andy Burnham’s Autumn budget – by gifting, setting up trusts or investing in business relief qualifying assets. Despite today’s figures it is not simply those in London and South East postcodes who should urgently consider active estate planning but anyone with sizeable estates wherever they live in the UK.”

ENDS

For press enquiries, please contact:

Louise Beeson at Bell Yard Kysen Communications: Louise@BYKcomms.com/ 07768 956997

Lauren Hurst at Bell Yard Kysen Communications: Lauren@BYKcomms.com / 07528 382514

NOTES FOR EDITORS

The Kingsley Napley Inheritance Tax Leaderboard is based on HMRC data from Inheritance Tax Returns published on 30 July 2026

(Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/inheritance-tax-liabilities-statistics/inheritance-tax-liabilities-statistics-commentary)

 

TABLES

Tax Receipts By Volume 2023/24 (source HMRC):

 

Rank Parliamentary Constituency Number Amount (£m)
1 Esher & Walton 167 70
2 Richmond Park 162 84
3 Chichester 157 48
4 Mole Valley 156 53
5 Beaconsfield 150 43
6 Chesham & Amersham 146 46
7 Twickenham 142 37
8 Finchley & Golders Green 139 46
9 Wimbledon 135 59
10 South West Surrey 132 49

Tax Receipts By Value 2023/24:

 

Rank Parliamentary Constituency Amount (£m) Number
1 Kensington 107 100
2 Cities of London & Westminster 97 103
3 Richmond Park 84 162
4 Esher & Walton 70 167
5 Hampstead and Kilburn 70 111
6 Chelsea & Fulham 61 91
7 Wimbledon 59 135
8 Mole Valley 53 156
9 Chichester 48 157
10 Cheshire & Amersham 46 146

 

PREVIOUS FIGURES:

 

Tax Receipts By Volume 2022/23 (source HMRC):

Rank Parliamentary Constituency Number Amount (£m)
1 Richmond Park 184 71
2 Finchley and Golders Green 183 103
3 Esher and Walton 156 52
4 Chesham and Amersham 143 36
5 Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner 142 46
6 Chichester 142 38
7 Epsom and Ewell 139 40
8 Twickenham 136 33
9 Beaconsfield 136 31
10 Worthing West 136 23

 

Tax Receipts By Value 2022/23: 

Rank Parliamentary Constituency Amount (£m) Number
1 Kensington 154 112
2 Chelsea and Fulham 107 96
3 Finchley and Golders Green 103 183
5 Cities of London and Westminster 85 79
6 Hampstead and Kilburn 84 117
7 Richmond Park 71 184
8 Wimbledon 69 124
9 Esher and Walton 52 156
10 South West Surrey 47 135

Tax Receipts By Volume 2021/22 (source HMRC):

Rank Parliamentary Constituency Number Amount (£m)
1 Chichester 153 47
2 Esher and Walton 150 45
3 Finchley and Golders Green 148 59
4 Richmond Park 145 55
5 South West Surrey 140 49
6 Chesham and Amersham 131 35
7 Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner 127 28
8 Hampstead and Kilburn 123 81
9 Chipping Barnet 121 27
10 Hornsey and Wood Green 121 33

Tax Receipts By Value 2021/22:

 Rank Parliamentary Constituency Amount (£m) Number
1 Kensington 103 92
2 Hampstead and Kilburn 81 123
3 Chelsea and Fulham 76 106
4 South West Hertfordshire 61 113
5 Finchley and Golders Green 59 148
6 Richmond Park 55 145
7 Cities of London and Westminster 51 77
8 South West Surrey 49 140
9 Chichester 47 153
10 Windsor 46 78

Previous crunches of this annual data can be found here:

The Kingsley Napley Inheritance Tax Leaderboard is based on HMRC data from Inheritance Tax Returns published on 30 July 2026 (Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/inheritance-tax-liabilities-statistics/inheritance-tax-liabilities-statistics-commentary

2025 press release https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/our-insights/press-releases/kingsley-napleys-inheritance-tax-leaderboard/

2024 press release https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/our-news/press-releases/kingsley-napleys-inheritance-tax-olympics

2022 press release: https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/our-news/press-releases/is-iht-reform-now-on-thecards#:~:text=Kingsley%20Napley’s%20’Inheritance%20Tax%20Premier,receipts%20totalled%20%C2%A36.1bn.

2021 press release: https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/our-news/press-releases/kingsley-napley-unveils-the-inheritance-tax-premier-league-itpl

KN_Insights

Stay informed

Get the latest insights, news and events from Kingsley Napley straight to your inbox.

Subscribe