Coronavirus Inquest FAQs

The following FAQs set out the key inquest questions that may arise at this time of crisis.

What is an inquest?

An inquest is a fact finding exercise carried out by the coroner following a death. The role of the coroner is to ascertain who has died, where, when and how. An inquest only happens in very specific circumstances when it is determined by the coroner or the law that an investigation is necessary. 

If you are involved in an inquest you can find more information about the inquest process on our Inquests page.

When a person has died from coronavirus, will a coroner conduct an investigation and hold an inquest?

A coroner can only open an investigation where he or she has a reason to suspect that the cause of death was unknown, the death happened in state custody or the death was violent or unnatural. Where someone has died from coronavirus it is unlikely that a coroner will initiate an inquest other than in very specific circumstances.

The Chief Coroner announced early on that COVID-19 related fatalities were to be considered a ‘natural death.’ This means that unless a COVID-19 related death occurred in state custody, the coroner would have to identify some unnatural element which contributed to the death for an inquest to be opened.

Where human neglect contributed to a natural death, the death might then be considered unnatural. It could be argued that human failings in response to dealing with the pandemic contributed to certain deaths and these were therefore unnatural deaths. This might be the case where, for example, the death was a result of inadequate medical equipment to deal with the illness. It is likely that medical professionals will refute such allegations, pointing to systemic failings which are not to be addressed at inquests. 

There is an obligation to report a death to the coroner where someone has died from a disease contracted by reason of their work. If the coroner suspects that someone was infected as a result of their duties as an employee, the coroner should initiate an investigation. Bus drivers, NHS staff and social workers are examples of employees who may have been exposed to COVID-19 through their workplace.

When an inquest is opened after someone has died from coronavirus, how long will it take?

Normally an inquest hearing is within 6 months of the death being investigated. However this timeframe is likely to be extended due to pressure on the system and where adjournments are necessary as a direct result of restrictions arising from COVID-19.

For more information on the conduct of inquests during the pandemic, please see our blog The inquest process during COVID-19 restrictions.

Will the coroner explain the cause of death at the end of the inquest when someone has died from coronavirus?

At the conclusion of the inquest, the coroner will give a verdict on where, when and how the deceased died. In relation to ‘how’ someone died, the possible outcomes include neglect, accident, suicide, natural causes, an open conclusion (where there is not enough evidence to reach a conclusion) and a narrative verdict (where a more expansive conclusion is given to explain the issues raised).

Whilst this helps to explain the medical cause of someone’s death, the explanation about the circumstances which led to the death might be limited. The Chief Coroner has made it clear in published guidance that an inquest is not the appropriate forum for addressing government or public policy in relation to COVID-19. Where there have been systemic failings by state bodies, which could be particularly relevant in the wake of COVID-19, a public inquiry is usually considered a more appropriate to address the alleged failures. In this situation an inquest might be suspended whilst a public inquiry is carried out.

What application does article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights have?

An article 2 inquest relates to the investigation of a death which is believed to have resulted from a failure of the state to protect the deceased’s life. If the deceased was in state care or under the responsibility of healthcare professionals this category of inquest might be relevant. The government has an obligation to take appropriate measures to safeguard lives and where there is a failing in this respect, it can be addressed in what is known as an article 2 inquest. For more information look at our previous blog on article 2 inquests What is an 'Article 2 inquest' and why does it matter?. Alternatively, in order to satisfy its obligations under article 2, the government can initiate a public inquiry.

What is the difference between a public inquiry and an inquest in explaining why someone has died from coronavirus?

Both a public inquiry and an inquest can be used to look into the reasons behind a death occurring at the hands of the state. However, with respect to deaths due to COVID-19, a public inquiry tends to deal with broader failings and lessons to be learnt from these failings, rather than separate fatalities.

A public inquiry is called when there are particular events which are a matter of public concern. Only a government minister can call an inquiry, which is then facilitated by a balanced panel of people with appropriate expertise. An inquiry is concluded with the publication of a report which goes before Parliament. Examples of previous inquiries include those looking into the Grenfell Tower tragedy. To find out more about public inquiries please see our Public Inquiries FAQs.

It is expected that a public inquiry will be held with respect to COVID-19. An inquest could be suspended for the duration of a public inquiry.

Is a coroner able to hold to account those responsible for any failings with respect to death from coronavirus?

Inquests are not permitted to determine blame and the verdict will not identify someone as having criminal or civil liability. If there is a question of blame, this will be for the criminal or civil courts to decide and will require separate legal action. Evidence that is gathered in the course of an inquest from disclosure or witness evidence can be used and is often crucial for the success of any civil claims or prosecutions.

If the coroner concludes that something could be done to prevent future deaths, they are obliged to produce a “Prevention of Future Death Report” which is sent to relevant organisations.


If you would like any further information or advice about the issues explored, please contact any member of our Inquests Team.


Latest blogs & news

The Terms of Reference for the Scottish Covid-19 Inquiry

As we await the publication of the terms of reference for the UK wide Covid-19 Inquiry, in this blog I consider the key features of the recently published terms of reference for the Scottish Inquiry into the Covid-19 pandemic.

The Covid-19 Inquiry – the importance of the terms of reference

Any day now the Covid-19 Inquiry will publish draft terms of reference. This will be a significant event.  Once agreed, the terms of reference will determine the scope and length of the inquiry which is due to begin its work in the Spring.  In turn this will have a direct impact on how valuable the inquiry turns out to be.  

The right to equality in fertility treatment

A same-sex couple have commenced a significant test case against a branch of the NHS fertility sector for discrimination against them on grounds of their sexuality. 

Court considers that intransigent public inquiry witnesses will often give evidence once they have been compelled to attend

In a 16 November 2021 blog, I described how refusing to give evidence to a public inquiry might play out. Another new case, Chairman of the Manchester Arena Inquiry v Romdhan [2021] EWHC 3274 (Admin), reinforces my view. Potential witnesses in next year’s coronavirus (Covid-19) inquiry take note.


Essential Planning for the COVID Inquiry - Sophie Kemp provides insight for the Carer

Given a judge-led inquiry into how the Scottish Government handled the COVID pandemic will start before the end of this year, many are anxiously awaiting news of the Government’s promised UK- wide public inquiry.

Back in May 2021, No 10 committed to that inquiry starting in Spring 2022. Yet months on, details are scant. Who will Chair it? What are its terms of reference? Yes, there may be six months to go, but vital questions remain before any inquiry of this national significance and stature begins.

Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccinations for Care Home Workers

This week, the Government announced that Covid-19 vaccinations will be made compulsory for care home staff, raising strong emotions on both sides of the argument.

Coaching, Teaching and Support Work in Lockdown: Safeguarding and Data Protection considerations when working with children online

The COVID-19 crisis has forced sports clubs, schools, universities and charities to rapidly change their approaches to coaching, teaching and support work. The regulations on social distancing have forced organisations to innovate; services which had previously been offered mostly or wholly in person were rapidly shifted online during “lockdown 1” and will return online at least for the duration of “lockdown 3”.  If the vaccine rollout has the desired effect there will no doubt be some return to “traditional” methods, but it seems very unlikely that the changes brought about by the pandemic will be completely reversed.  In this blog, Claire Parry from Kingsley Napley’s Regulatory team and Fred Allen from the Public Law team look at the challenges organisations face engaging with children online.

Regulation and Uptake of the COVID-19 Vaccine

The government has now approved the supply of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The reason they have been able to do this so quickly is because they have taken advantage of the temporary authorisation regime laid out by the Human Medicine Regulations of 2012 and 2020. The 2012 Regulations were updated in 2020 specifically to facilitate the smooth rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine. In the public consultation preceding the introduction of these updated regulations, several respondents raised concerns regarding unlicensed vaccines and immunity from civil liability. In practice, very little is known about these regulations and their application. This article seeks to shed some light on the temporary authorisation regime and suggest a means of alleviating concerns in the context of “vaccine hesitancy”.

Parliamentary scrutiny in the time of Coronavirus

As a new nationwide lockdown comes into effect, Stephen Parkinson and Charlie Roe from our Public Law team, consider the often limited role of Parliament in scrutinising restrictive regulations throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

The inquest process during COVID-19 restrictions

Inquest proceedings, like other legal proceedings in the UK, have been significantly affected by social distancing restrictions and advice arising from the COVID-19 crisis. This blog looks briefly at the impact of the Coronavirus Act 2020 on proceedings, and examines the Chief Coroner’s guidance notes to coroners working during the crisis.

The future public inquiry into COVID-19

The devastation wrought by COVID-19 has led to profound questions about the UK government’s response to the pandemic. Calls for a public inquiry are continuing to mount and are likely to prove difficult to resist. This blog considers the framework for such inquiries, and the key issues likely to form the core of its terms of reference.

COVID-19 and contact tracing apps: A test of public confidence in data privacy?

Dominic Raab announced last week that the current UK lockdown would last for at least another three weeks. These restrictions are unlikely to be relaxed until a large scale plan is in place to track and restrict the spread of the virus. Part of this plan will involve the use of the NHS “contact tracing” app, which we have been told is in an advanced stage of development.

COVID-19 related insights:

COVID-19 related insights:

Our COVID-19 statement

We recognise that these unique times are presenting unprecedented challenges for our clients and we are here to support you in any way we can.

Click to view

Can you get out of or suspend a contract because of Coronavirus?

Alex Torpey covers the key things to look out for if you are relying on the Force Majeure clause.

Watch the video on LinkedIn

Overcoming the challenges of co-parenting for separated and divorced parents

Rachel Freeman, Partner in our Family Law team, addresses some issues that we are seeing arise for separated parents in the current crisis.

Read the blog

Tech in Two Minutes - Episode 7 - The Coronavirus challenge for tech coworking spaces

Andrew Solomon speaks about the challenge for tech companies and coworking spaces during the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Listen to the podcast

The legal basis for lockdown

Alun Milford, Partner in our Criminal Litigation team, provides an in-depth look at the legal basis behind the current lockdown.

Read the blog

Managing your Migrant workforce in the COVID-19 crisis

On Friday 3 April, immigration partner and head of department, Nick Rollason, hosted a webinar looking at urgent issues employers are facing during the COVID-19 crisis and answered some of the key questions being raised.

Watch the webinar recording

Furlough leave and the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: key legal considerations for Employers

On Thursday 9 April, Andreas White, Partner in our Employment Law Team, delivered an overview of the scheme with a focus of the key legal issues for UK employers.

Watch the webinar recording

Coronavirus and the perils of signing your Will

Will instructions have apparently risen by 30% since COVID-19 reached our shores. What effect does COVID-19 have on Will signings? James Ward and Diva Shah in our Private Client team blog.

Read the blog

The juggling act of a single mother, home school teacher and head of a family team

Charlotte Bradley, Head of our Family Law Team, reflects on how the COVID-19 crisis has affected working parents like her.

Read the blog

The future public inquiry into COVID-19

Calls for a public inquiry are continuing to mount and are likely to prove difficult to resist. In this blog, Sophie Kemp considers the framework for such inquiries, and the key issues likely to form the core of its terms of reference.

Read the blog

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility