Eye Injury Claims

We have supported clients bringing claims involving blindness and visual impairment, whether due to sub-standard medical treatment or following an accident, for many decades.

Examples of the sort of cases we have experience investigating include:

  • Avoidable loss of vision caused by delays in diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma
  • Failure to diagnose and treat retinopathy of prematurity, immediately following birth
  • Total blindness resulting from severe brain damage caused at birth due to oxygen deprivation (asphyxia)
  • Sub-standard cataract surgery
  • Sub-standard laser eye procedures

In addition, we have vast knowledge and experience of handling claims involving blindness and visual impairment, whether due to sub-standard medical treatment or following an accident including:

  • Failure to refer to rheumatology for diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis
  • Delayed diagnosis of corneal ulcer
  • Personal injury claims involving eye trauma

We have established links with the very best medico-legal experts in the fields of ophthalmology and optometry. We have also developed a close relationship with the RNIB (Royal National Institute for the Blind) for whom members of our team have campaigned to improve ophthalmic healthcare standards and regularly volunteer for.

How we work with you

Loss of vision is a terrifying experience. Our clients and their families need our help and support in holding others to account and obtaining compensation where there has been a negligent cause. We are there to guide our clients through the process.  If successful, we aim to secure the best possible future financial support to make provision for items such as an enabling care package, the most advanced technological aids and appliances, and a home that has been adapted to maximise available light and/or space (where appropriate).

Claims involving ophthalmic injury can often depend on a single piece of evidence that is not always collectable from the most obvious source. In cases involving glaucoma, it is sometimes not readily apparent when preventable but irreversible optic nerve damage first started occurring. Obtaining and preserving earlier medical records (including colour photographs and eye imaging) from all relevant sources can be absolutely crucial. Failure to identify and include this evidence can make the difference between a successful and unsuccessful claim. Our past skill, experience, and collaboration with renowned experts in this field has sometimes proved to be that difference.

We advise and support our clients (and their families) through the litigation process every step of the way.


What our clients and directories have said

Kingsley Napley LLP’s ‘top-flight’ clinical negligence team remains a ‘front runner’, and provides an ‘amazing level of service’.

Legal 500

Clients are "absolutely delighted" with the superlative service they receive from the "experienced, skilful, compassionate and understanding" team.

Chambers UK, A Client's Guide to the Legal Profession

Eye Injury Claims Insights

View all


The ‘Weekend Effect’ – How to avoid dying in hospital

Clinical Negligence - fix the costs and you load the die

Quick Guide: Delayed Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis

2014 Vision UK Conference – let’s not lose sight of the problem

NHS & the Berwick Review: Shaping the Duty of Candour

The surgery scheduling lottery

Pilot of fixed costs scheme for clinical negligence claims

Criticisms of the Court of Protection – are they justified?

Major changes both to NHS services and funding of clinical negligence claims - a coincidence of timing?

Is Jeremy Hunt serious about tackling the “culture of complacency” and “postcode lottery”?

The Mid Staffordshire Public Inquiry Report – the beginning of a journey towards a healthier culture in the NHS?

The NHS and nursing - the constant revolution

NHS Care “Appalling”

Rogue Doctors: fixing the problem

Health Ombudsman finds inadequate communication increases complaints

The welcome news about supplementary legal aid scheme being abandoned

Clinical Negligence claims: The argument for being able to instruct your own expert

Doctor complaints hit record levels – men vs. women?

Life after intensive care

Clinical negligence: a culture of litigation?

Client anonymity in clinical negligence claims – the dilemma of litigating

Clinical negligence claims: Punishing doctors’ mistakes or compensating patients’ loss?

Medical Negligence – on the increase?

Too much, too little, too late: the hazards of prescription errors

Does having a disability make it more difficult to have a relationship?

Discharging patients inappropriately

Patient care: Diabetes Healthcare in ‘Crisis’

Delays in diagnosis: Ovarian cancer

Close Load more

Let us take it from here.

+44 (0)20 7814 1200


Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility