Nick Wrightson


Public Law | Judicial Review | Public Inquiries

"A real star in the making."

Chambers UK, 2021

Described by clients as  “extremely attentive and ‘on the ball’… and just easy to work with” Nick is a partner whose administrative and public law practice focuses on judicial review litigation and supporting clients through public inquiries and complex inquests.

Clients say they have “learnt to trust [Nick] in the most delicate of matters, and place great weight on [his] advice”. They have praised his “care, and expertise beyond expectations”, including in times of emergency.

A specialist public lawyer since 2011, Nick’s experience includes representing prominent private companies, individuals and organisations as well as public bodies - often in contentious, high profile and politically inflected cases. He is regularly instructed on potential or actual judicial review claims (particularly in commercial and regulatory contexts) and has experience in the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. He has worked with claimants, defendants, interested parties and interveners. Nick has recently supported key participants and worked with witnesses in two major public inquiries, as well as in two large scale terrorism-related inquests. Beyond the courts, he has helped public sector clients to understand their duties, make key decisions and manage their litigation risks.

Nick also advises on the interpretation of legislation and regulations, freedom of information requests and the public law aspects of criminal and regulatory investigations and proceedings. He has worked with suspects and witnesses (including senior figures) in notable financial crime and regulatory investigations and has acted for the regulator in substantial professional disciplinary proceedings.

Before joining Kingsley Napley in May 2017 Nick trained and later became a senior associate at one of the world's leading professional services businesses. He was promoted to partner at Kingsley Napley in May 2021. Nick is a Solicitor-Advocate (Higher Courts Civil Proceedings) and has a Postgraduate Diploma in Laws (Public Law) from the University of London. He gained his first degree, masters and doctorate in history from the University of Oxford.

What clients have said

He has provided intellectual firepower in going through our witness statements with a fine-tooth comb to ensure clarity."

Chambers UK, 2021

Whilst Nick’s professional knowledge is significant, it was his personable style alongside his attentiveness, diligence and sheer professionalism that meant I always had so much confidence in his legal representation.”

A senior individual

I appreciate enormously the care and concern that you and your colleagues showed towards me during this time, as well as your professional advice…” 

A senior individual

“…the [client] continues to be enormously appreciative of the attention to detail and care with which you and Adam have been advising and representing the community.” “Client care has been exceptional.”

A representative organisation


Professional societies and memberships


Related Services

Public Law

Our 'exceptional' team has over 25 years' experience, acting in the most significant public law cases.

Judicial Review

We are known for our notable strengths in judicial review litigation and our incisive and pragmatic advice.

Public Inquiries

The team is consistently recognised for its public inquiry expertise, with over 25 years experience in all the major inquiries.


Our team has an established record of representing families, organisations, other interested persons and witnesses at inquests.

Freedom of Information/Environmental Information

Our team has extensive experience acting for central government, businesses & senior police officers on their information rights.

Public Policy and Governance

We have expertise in administrative and public law, together with our real enthusiasm for the work we do.

Select Committees

Our team is experienced in representing senior professionals, public figures and major corporations before Parliamentary Select Committees.

Advice for Regulators and Public Bodies

We have acted for regulatory authorities for several decades, providing advice concerning their regulatory functions and operations.


When an individual or company is faced with a criminal or regulatory investigation we manage every step of the process.

Dealing with an Investigation

Under investigation? We ensure you have the specialist, strategic advice to help you manage.

Political Affairs

Our international work includes dealing with the suite of issues that may arise from politically motivated persecutions.

Insight from Nick

View all


International Court of Justice and UN General Assembly do not alter the outcome of the Chagos Islands challenge

Voter ID laws and the way courts interpret legislation

The High Court confirms that unincorporated associations may participate in both judicial review claims and statutory challenges

What does the new government mean for public lawyers?

Uber back in the news

When do contracts and goodwill amount to A1P1 possession?

Enemies of the constitution? The words of those attacking independent judges are corrosive and wrong

Since prorogation ‘never happened’ what happens next?

When politics and law collide: The prorogation judicial reviews

Blowing spies’ legal cover? Reprieve threatens judicial review of alleged government misuse of the ‘James Bond clause’

What is secondary legislation and why do we have it?

Kingsley Napley considers statutory instruments and Brexit

Divorced, beheaded, scrutinised? SIs and Henry VIII powers under review

Ordinarily hard to challenge ombudsman’s decision-making marred by illegality, irrationality, procedural unfairness and pre-determination

Opaque, unpredictable, diminished? Parliamentary committee commentary suggests the human rights consequences of #Brexit withdrawal legislation “appear to be contrary to the Government’s intent”

Legal update: Unlawful Discrimination in Personal Independence Payments

Cheap alcohol a thing of the past (at least for six years)?

R (on the application of Ngole) v University of Sheffield (Health and Care Professions Council intervening) [2017] EWHC 2669 (Admin)

Legal Update: NGOs win challenge to Aarhus costs caps

Uber’s apology considered by Kingsley Napley

TfL finds Uber no-longer ‘fit and proper’ to operate in London

The special constitutional importance of judicial review may demand a distinctive approach to the recovery of litigation costs, but will the latest recommendations be taken forward?

A challenge to the lawfulness of export licences allowing arms sales to Saudi Arabia has been rejected

The Queen’s Speech 2017 – Setting the parliamentary agenda

Will legislating for Brexit be almost as testing for the new minority government as the forthcoming negotiations?

How would a minority government or coalition led by Theresa May go about changing human rights laws in the fight against terrorism?

Close Load more

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility