Medical Negligence and Personal Injury claims: what you need to know podcast series
In the fourth episode of our Medical Negligence and Personal Injury claims: what you need to know podcast, Laura Sylvester and Aideen McGarry speak about the initial stages of making a medical negligence claim or a personal injury claim. They discuss the various steps in the process which include, obtaining all relevant documents, investigating the claim, drafting witness statements, exploring the extent of injuries and financial losses, pre-action protocols, resolving the claim, and what happens if the claim is omitted or denied.
If you would like to download this podcast, please click here.
- Episode 1 - Limitation period
- Episode 2 - Funding a claim (part 1)
- Episode 3 - Funding a claim (part 2)
READ THE TRANSCRIPTION
The first step is to obtain all relevant documents for your case. This may include obtaining your medical records, any complaints correspondence, investigation reports, photographs or any other documents that relate to what happened which might help us prove the case.
We will then work with you to draft a witness statement which will set down your account of what happened, this is your opportunity to tell your story and will help guide your legal team, the experts and the courts later in the claim by making sure all the key facts are available.
At this early stage in the investigation, it may also be prudent to explore the extent of your injuries and financial losses so that we can start to assess the value of your claim. We will then review the evidence gathered and we will advise you on whether we have enough information to move on to the pre-action protocol stage, or whether we need to obtain more evidence, such as expert evidence first to help us to establish what happened and whether there was an negligence or any fault by another party.
After investigating your claim, if your solicitor believes you have sufficient prospects of winning the next step would be to engage in what is called the pre-action protocol. There are specific pre-action protocols depending on the type of claim you have. The protocols are standards of conduct which the courts expect parties to follow. The purpose of this is to give the proposed defendants sufficient information and understanding of your claim to enable them to investigate it and where appropriate, resolve it.
The aim is to resolve claims at an early stage without involving the courts system, in an effort to save money and court time. Whilst a potential claimant could just issue their claim at court, they risk the courts imposing costs sanctions on them for doing so.
The first step in the pre-action protocol is usually to send a letter of claims to the defendant. The pre-action protocol sets out the points which will be contained in the letter of claims. This includes, a summary of the facts, the injuries the claimant has suffered and the main allegations of negligence. The important thing is that a defendant has enough information to enable them to focus the investigation and put an initial value on the case.
The next step envisaged by the pre-action protocol is for the proposed defendant to send a letter of response to the claimants letter of claim within four months. Often when the issues in the claim are complex, a defendant will ask for extra time to serve the letter of response. Again, the protocol describes what this letter should contain, perhaps most importantly a letter of response should set out clearly, whether the claim or part of it is admitted or denied. If the claim is admitted, the pre-action protocol includes provisions for making offers of settlement. Either side can offer to settle the potential claim for compensation on any term. If the claim is denied, your solicitors will consider the defendants comments on the allegations of negligence and re-assess with you the strengths and weaknesses of your proposed claim.
Bringing a claim can seem like a daunting prospect but your solicitor will guide you through the process and explain what each step entails as you go through the claim.
ABOUT THE SPEAKERS
Laura Sylvester is a Senior Associate in the Medical Negligence and Personal Injury team. She has a broad range of expertise, with experience including brain injury claims relating to children with cerebral palsy; colorectal/abdominal and gynaecology claims; and late diagnosis of infection cases and fatal claims. Laura acts for children and adults from all walks of life and she has received praise from clients about her professionalism, together with her ability to act in a sympathetic and supportive manner and she has experience of guiding clients through the legal process whilst understanding the needs of her clients.
Aideen McGarry is an Associate in the Medical Negligence and Personal Injury team. Aideen has experience working on high-value clinical negligence and personal injury claims. She has acted for clients in claims against their GP, hospital or health providers in relation to injuries suffered as a result of wrong treatment, surgical error, delay or missed diagnosis. Aideen has also represented clients injured in road traffic accidents, accidents at work and accidents on public property.
Latest blogs & news
According to the Urology Foundation, one in two of us will be affected by a urological condition in our lifetime.
10th September is World Suicide Prevention Day. Each year, on the same date, communities and organisations campaign on a global scale to raise awareness of the tragedy of suicide and explore ways in which we can all help to prevent it.
When a loved one dies, grief is difficult and there can be a lot to deal with. If someone dies as a result of medical negligence or personal injury, then it’s important to consider who can bring a claim.
Whether the claimant or defendant, successful parties to civil litigation can be disappointed to hear that they are highly unlikely to recover all of their legal spend. The losing party is only required to pay what is considered reasonable and proportionate. A key feature in what is recovered is the reasonableness of the hourly rates charged by the successful litigant’s solicitors.
An aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition, requiring early diagnosis and treatment. Sadly, classic symptoms are often misdiagnosed or dismissed, which quickly lead to the patient’s death. We have experience of successfully investigating claims of this nature.
Much has been said about the 2020 Court of Appeal judgment in Swift dealing with the disputed method by which claims for the cost of special accommodation following severe injuries are calculated, and rightly so; it was a privilege for one of the authors of this article to work on a case of such wide application and with such benefit for so many Claimants.
The recent decision in the case of Malik -v- St George’s University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust provides a further example of this approach. Mr Malik required emergency spinal surgery in the form of a laminectomy and discectomy at T10/11. No criticism was made of the performance of the surgery. Post-operatively Mr Malik experienced ongoing numbness and weakness in his left leg. His surgeon recommended further revision decompression surgery which unfortunately left Mr Malik with an incomplete paraparesis. He was classified as a T7 ASIA D paraplegic.
The National Disability Strategy: the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan ever. Is it really?
On the 28 July 2021, the Government unveiled the highly anticipated National Disability Strategy (‘the strategy’). Pledged in the Government’s 2019 manifesto, the aim is to “improve the everyday lives of disabled people”. The Prime Minister described the strategy as the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan relating to disability ever. A bold claim, but is it justified?
July is International Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Awareness Month. As medical negligence specialists at Kingsley Napley, we have acted for many families who have been affected due to delays in the diagnosis and treatment of a GBS infection.
The Nursing Times recently published an article on blame culture within midwifery, which is apparently affecting staff retention. The article discussed a hearing of the Health and Social Care Select Committee which has been leading an Inquiry into the safety of maternity services in England
The FCA has launched a consultation on a technical note setting out guidance for companies applying for listing which have cannabis-related businesses. As with all companies applying for listing, those with cannabis related businesses must be assessed for eligibility for listing under the Listing Rules. Because of the legal complexities around cannabis businesses the FCA applies additional due diligence requirements to them.
June is Sands (Stillbirth and Neonatal death) Awareness Month. We are blogging to raise awareness of the work carried out by Sands and their contribution to improving bereavement care and funding research into saving babies’ lives.
This week is Cervical Screening Awareness Week which is run by Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust. This week aims to reduce confusion about human papillomavirus (HPV), de-mystify cervical screening results and highlight the importance of attending cervical screening appointments.
We’ve been running trials of E-Scooters in various parts of the UK for nearly a year and London finally followed suit this week in four boroughs with Canary Wharf to follow a little later.
It often takes many years for victims of sexual abuse to come forward. Claimants often feel embarrassed, and sometimes even partially responsible, for the abuse suffered. The Truth Project was set up in 2015 as part of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse to help victims come forwards. Over 5,000 individuals have since disclosed instances of sexual abuse as part of the Project.
Kirsty Allen discusses the report produced by The Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) which finds that improvements need to be made in outpatient clinics to avoid healthcare teams confusing patients
Spinal Cord Injuries Awareness Day is held annually in May. It is an annual event run by the Spinal Injuries Association (SIA) and their charity partners. The aim of the day is to raise awareness and understanding the impact and effect of spinal cord injury told through personal stories of those affected. This year the awareness day has a poignancy about it – with the country coming out of lockdown having spent 14 months coping with the challenges that come with a pandemic, it is a reminder that the challenges the wider community have encountered over the past year are common on-going challenges for those with a spinal cord injury. For example, difficulties in accessing specialist healthcare services at a time of need and restrictions on accessing the wider community.
According to the most recent NHS statistics 2,500 people are injured or diagnosed with a spinal cord injury every year. Indeed it is estimated that there are a total of 50,000 people living in the UK with a spinal cord injury of some sort. Unfortunately sustaining a spinal cord injury impacts on every aspect of a person’s life. Often, where everyday tasks are a challenge, returning to work may seem unrealistic. The fact is that employment rates among people with spinal cord injuries remain much lower than the general population.
Spinal injuries are unpredictable and life changing. The location of the injury is key, and generally speaking the higher up the injury in the spinal column, the more severe the consequences.