<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Professional Services</title><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/professional-services</link><generator>KohanaPHP</generator><item><title>Workplace risk assessments: understanding legal duties under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999</title><author>Andrew Sanderson</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/workplace-risk-assessments-understanding-legal-duties-under-the-management-of-health-and-safety-at-work-regulations-1999</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Ensuring the safety and health of employees is a cornerstone of responsible business practice in the UK. At the heart of this responsibility lies the legal requirement to carry out workplace risk assessments—a duty enshrined in the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 (MHSWR). This article sets out the legal framework surrounding risk assessments, outlines practical steps for compliance, and includes expert insights from Andrew Sanderson of Kingsley Napley and Craig Lydiate of Eighty20 Risk Systems.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/workplace-risk-assessments-understanding-legal-duties-under-the-management-of-health-and-safety-at-work-regulations-1999</guid></item><item><title>RICS shines its spotlight on the use of AI: have your say</title><author>Julie Matheson</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/rics-shines-its-spotlight-on-the-use-of-ai-have-your-say</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Another week, another consultation deadline for a proposed RICS standard. As foreshadowed in our previous blog, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) is currently seeking feedback on its proposed Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence, 1st Edition standard (Proposed Standard).</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/rics-shines-its-spotlight-on-the-use-of-ai-have-your-say</guid></item><item><title>The time for feedback is today: RICS’ updated Countering Financial Crime Standard</title><author>Julie Matheson</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/the-time-for-feedback-is-today-rics-updated-countering-financial-crime-standard</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Time is running out for Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) members and other stakeholders to have their say on RICS’ proposed second edition of its Countering Financial Crime Standard (Proposed Standard).

 </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/the-time-for-feedback-is-today-rics-updated-countering-financial-crime-standard</guid></item><item><title>Press Round-Up: Regulatory and Professional Discipline - December 2024 - January 2025</title><author>Shannett Thompson</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/press-round-up-regulatory-and-professional-discipline-december-2024-january-2025</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>A summary of media coverage between December 2024 and January 2025</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/press-round-up-regulatory-and-professional-discipline-december-2024-january-2025</guid></item><item><title>Festive frolics or regulatory wrongs in accountancy firms?</title><author>Julie Matheson and Caroline Day</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/festive-frolics-or-regulatory-wrongs-in-accountancy-firms</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Best practice guidance to accountancy firms on how to conduct an investigation in the event of allegations of behavioural misconduct in the run-up to Christmas.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/festive-frolics-or-regulatory-wrongs-in-accountancy-firms</guid></item><item><title>Festive frolics or regulatory wrongs in accountancy firms: a three-part podcast series</title><author>Julie Matheson</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/festive-frolics-or-regulatory-wrongs-in-accountancy-firms-a-three-part-podcast-series</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>T’is the season of the office Christmas party – but accountants must be aware that their behaviour in this professional setting may still be caught by their regulator’s Code of Ethics.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/festive-frolics-or-regulatory-wrongs-in-accountancy-firms-a-three-part-podcast-series</guid></item><item><title>Inappropriate emails - ICAEW case provides helpful guidance on the threshold for discreditable behaviour</title><author>Julie Matheson</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/inappropriate-emails-icaew-case-provides-helpful-guidance-on-the-threshold-for-discreditable-behaviour</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>In a recent case, a member of the ICAEW (Mr F) was excluded from membership for sending numerous emails between 2015 and 2018 which were found to be contrary to the requirements of the ICAEW’s Code of Ethics in relation to professional behaviour.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/inappropriate-emails-icaew-case-provides-helpful-guidance-on-the-threshold-for-discreditable-behaviour</guid></item><item><title>The long and winding road…. that leads to….. ARGA</title><author>Julie Matheson</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/the-long-and-winding-road-that-leads-to-arga</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Following the submissions of the Financial Reporting Council (‘FRC’)  to the BEIS Select Committee in September 2020, in which it set out its progress so far under the Transformation Programme, the FRC this week has launched a consultation on its draft Strategy and Plan &amp; Budget 2021/22, calling for stakeholder comments by 12 March 2021.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/the-long-and-winding-road-that-leads-to-arga</guid></item><item><title>The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement – can UK qualified accountants still work in the EU?</title><author>Julie Matheson</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/the-eu-uk-trade-and-cooperation-agreement-can-uk-qualified-accountants-still-work-in-the-eu</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Julie Matheson and Lucinda Soon consider the implications of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement on UK accountants providing services in the EU. </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/the-eu-uk-trade-and-cooperation-agreement-can-uk-qualified-accountants-still-work-in-the-eu</guid></item><item><title>Is the FRC considering whether Sarbanes-Oxley should cross the waters?</title><author>Julie Matheson</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/is-the-frc-considering-whether-sarbanes-oxley-should-cross-the-waters</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The general election is now over, and Parliament has more time to deal with matters other than Brexit. The spotlight has therefore returned to corporate governance, with The Sunday Times reporting that the FRC is developing a “British version of Sarbanes-Oxley”. It reported that this would “heap more responsibility on to directors, asking them to vouch regularly for the integrity of their financial controls and – if passed into law in the UK – opening the possibility of criminal proceedings against chief executives and finance directors for reporting misleading statements to the market.”</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/is-the-frc-considering-whether-sarbanes-oxley-should-cross-the-waters</guid></item><item><title>New ICAEW sanctions guidance on criminal convictions, cautions and Anti-Money Laundering</title><author>Julie Norris</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/new-icaew-sanctions-guidance-on-criminal-convictions-cautions-and-anti-money-laundering</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>From 1 April 2019, criminal conduct by ICAEW members will be dealt with according to the new version of the Guidance on Sanctions, which simplifies as well as amplifies the 2018 version.

Further changes will follow in July 2019, with the introduction of new guidance for Anti-Money Laundering breaches where the relevant conduct has not resulted in a criminal conviction.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/new-icaew-sanctions-guidance-on-criminal-convictions-cautions-and-anti-money-laundering</guid></item><item><title>Think before you tweet – the perils of social media for the accountancy profession</title><author>Regulatory Team</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/think-before-you-tweet-the-perils-of-social-media-for-the-accountancy-profession</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Social media has introduced to professionals a global platform for promoting services to an ever-growing audience in order to network and reach out to new clients. It is increasingly a key focus of marketing strategy. Not only this but it is a space within which professionals can share and acquire knowledge.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/think-before-you-tweet-the-perils-of-social-media-for-the-accountancy-profession</guid></item><item><title>Changes to the SRA’s Reporting Obligation</title><author>Regulatory Team</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/changes-to-the-sras-reporting-obligation</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>On 7 February 2019 the SRA published its response to the August 2018 Reporting Concerns consultation.  As a result of the consultation, the SRA has decided to update its reporting obligation so that it reads as follows...</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/changes-to-the-sras-reporting-obligation</guid></item><item><title>CMA and Kingman confirm sea-change for the audit sector</title><author>Regulatory Team</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/cma-and-kingman-confirm-sea-change-for-the-audit-sector</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>In November of this year we blogged on the Financial Reporting Council’s (‘FRC’) recently published report ‘Developments in Audit’ and highlighted that the FRC’s review was running in parallel with the Competition and Markets Authority (‘CMA’) review of the sector. As we reported, such extensive review has been triggered following the high-profile collapses of companies such as Carillion and BHS.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/cma-and-kingman-confirm-sea-change-for-the-audit-sector</guid></item><item><title>FRC strategic review 2018: Developments in Audit</title><author>Julie Norris</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/frc-strategic-review-2018-developments-in-audit</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The high profile collapses of companies such as Carillion and BHS have reignited the debate about the effectiveness of statutory audit. In the FRC’s recently published report, Developments in Audit, the FRC grapples, not for the first time, with how to ensure that audit properly serves the public interest. Auditors can expect some pretty radical changes.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/frc-strategic-review-2018-developments-in-audit</guid></item><item><title>#MeToo one year on: can we expect regulatory guidance soon?</title><author>Julie Norris</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/metoo-one-year-on-can-we-expect-regulatory-guidance-soon</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>This week marks the first anniversary of the start of #metoo movement. The last 12 months have seen a seemingly unabaiting global conversation about the rising number of reports of sexual harassment, both inside and outside the workplace. Julie Norris and Charlotte Judd discuss sexual harassment in the workplace and firms’ regulatory obligations, calling for better #metoo related guidance from accounting regulators.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/metoo-one-year-on-can-we-expect-regulatory-guidance-soon</guid></item><item><title>SRA Price Transparency FAQs</title><author>Iain Miller</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/sra-price-transparency-faqs</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Last week the SRA published guidance on its Transparency Rules which will come into force in early December 2018. </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/sra-price-transparency-faqs</guid></item><item><title>Is it time to re-visit Bolton?</title><author>Iain Miller</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/is-it-time-to-re-visit-bolton</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>If you’re in any way involved in the world of professional regulation it can’t have escaped your attention that the definition of what may constitute a lack of integrity has recently been defined, and arguably widened, by the Court of Appeal.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/is-it-time-to-re-visit-bolton</guid></item><item><title>Solicitor challenges SDT’s restrictions on practice successfully</title><author>Legal Services Regulation Team</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/solicitor-challenges-sdts-restrictions-on-practice-successfully</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Whilst many solicitors before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) facing an integrity allegation would be relieved to avoid a strike off, the ability of the SDT to impose continuing restrictions on practice can have severe consequences on one’s career and the ability to earn a living. </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/solicitor-challenges-sdts-restrictions-on-practice-successfully</guid></item><item><title>Collateral damage - when regulatory findings harm the reputations of third parties</title><author>Julie Matheson</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/collateral-damage-when-regulatory-findings-harm-the-reputations-of-third-parties</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Whilst many people might be relieved not to be the subject to the scrutiny of a regulatory investigation, imagine the horror when a regulator publishes a written decision which makes criticisms of you in circumstances where you have not been given an opportunity to defend yourself?</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/regulatory-blog/collateral-damage-when-regulatory-findings-harm-the-reputations-of-third-parties</guid></item></channel></rss>
