Irish ruling on Polish extradition request has potentially far-reaching consequences for EAW scheme

14 March 2018

An Irish judge’s ruling in an extradition case has called into question Poland’s continued participation in the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) scheme, and perhaps even its role in the EU as a whole.

At root are the controversial reforms to the Polish judicial system introduced by the governing PiS (Law and Justice) party following its election in 2015. Two aspects of the reforms in particular - the assumption by the legislature of the power to make judicial appointments, and the merging of the justice ministry with the main prosecuting agency - led Justice Aileen Donnelly to refuse an extradition request and to refer the case (concerning Artur Celmer, an alleged drug trafficker) to the European Court of Justice (ECJ), citing “what appears to be the deliberate, calculated and provocative legislative dismantling by Poland of the independence of the judiciary, a key component of the rule of law”. Should the ECJ conclude that Poland’s courts no longer meet minimum EU standards, it may lead the Commission to suspend funding to Poland. The Commission has previously expressed its grave concerns about the “clear risk of a serious breach of the rule of law in Poland” and in December 2017 required the PiS to respond within three months, a deadline that expires next week.

Even if the nuclear outcome - suspension of funding and exclusion from EU legal processes - is avoided, the effect on the EAW scheme could be dramatic. Even before the ECJ rules on the matter, one can expect challenges to Polish extradition requests to rely on Justice Donnelly’s conclusion that PiS’s power grab has undermined the fundamental principle of mutual trust. Bearing in mind that more EAWs adjudicated by the English courts originate from Polish judicial authorities than from any other member state – over 15,500 since 2009 and nearly 2000 in 2016-17 - the effect is likely to be significant.

Obviously, it remains to be seen whether the courts here will entertain such challenges absent clear direction from the ECJ; practitioners’ expectations may be tempered by the sometimes inventive ways that judges approve the validity of requests. Nevertheless, the Celmer decision represents a significant development in extradition, and of course comes at a time of uncertainty and flux created by the UK’s decision to leave the EU. HMG has expressed its commitment to remaining in the EAW scheme post-Brexit, but it is becoming increasingly unclear what any surviving scheme will look like.

Further information

Should you have any questions about the issues covered in this blog, please contact a member of our Criminal Law team.

Share insightLinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email to a friend Print

Email this page to a friend

We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.

Leave a comment

You may also be interested in:

View all

Blogs

Guest blog: Corporate criminal liability under international law

Guest blog: Should companies have a duty to prevent human rights abuses?

Guest blog: How to get the attention of the board on human rights

Has Brexit undermined the UK’s ability to extradite its fugitives?

Extradition: The Divisional Court has refused to extradite alleged génocidaires to Rwanda--will a domestic prosecution follow?

International Criminal Law – A month in review – July 2017

Post-#Brexit extradition arrangements: clarity called for

Theresa May wants EU criminals out; following Brexit it may become more difficult to remove them

Global Laundromat and the proceeds of crime - what makes property “criminal” in extradition cases?

Genocide – Whether there exists an obligation in the UK to extradite or prosecute in such cases

International Criminal Law – A month in review – March 2017

Justice and Security - A series on the EU, the UK, and the outlook post-Brexit: blog #3 - Looking at the EAW

‘A very important time…in the security landscape of Europe’: director of Europol speaks to the Home Affairs Committee about the organisation’s future

International Criminal Law – A month in review – February 2017

International Criminal Court asked to investigate corporate actors for crimes against humanity linked to Australia’s detention regime

International Criminal Law – A month in review – January 2017

The UK, Europol…and the EU? Government announces intention to opt-in to new Europol framework creating closer ties with the EU

Brexit means Brexit but what about the European Arrest Warrant?

Considering business with Iran? Proceed with caution

Close Load more

Let us take it from here.

+44 (0)20 7814 1200

enquiries@kingsleynapley.co.uk

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility