<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Kingsley Napley Blog</title><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/</link><generator>KohanaPHP</generator><item><title>Malice through the looking glass</title><author>Simon Halberstam</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/technology-law-blog/malice-through-the-looking-glass</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	“Google Explorers” are, as you read this, walking around modelling and testing Google’s Glass having paid circa $1500 for the privilege. Glass comprises frameless glasses with a tiny computer screen fitted just above the user’s right eye which projects emails, maps, texts, takes pictures and films at a voice command. You may think this sounds a little Minority Report-esque, but these glasses are due to go on sale next year.</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/technology-law-blog/malice-through-the-looking-glass</guid></item><item><title>Employment Tribunal users meeting at London Central has the power to surprise</title><author>Richard Fox</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/employment-law-blog/employment-tribunal-users-meeting-at-london-central-has-the-power-to-surprise</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	I was fortunate to have attended what turned out to be one of the most interesting meetings of the year.  And get this.  It was the Employment Tribunal Users meeting at London Central.  No really.</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/employment-law-blog/employment-tribunal-users-meeting-at-london-central-has-the-power-to-surprise</guid></item><item><title>Crowdsourcing - a great concept but are you aware of the legal risks?</title><author>Roberta Draper</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/technology-law-blog/crowdsourcing-a-great-concept-but-are-you-aware-of-the-legal-risks</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	Crowdsourcing is, as its name suggests, outsourcing work to a crowd. Crowdsourcing is not to be confused with crowdfunding, which is raising capital from a crowd.</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/technology-law-blog/crowdsourcing-a-great-concept-but-are-you-aware-of-the-legal-risks</guid></item><item><title>No safe havens for offshore tax cheats – HMRC threaten criminal prosecutions</title><author>Louise Hodges</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/no-safe-havens-for-offshore-tax-cheats-hmrc-threaten-criminal-prosecutions</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	On 9 May HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) repeated its message that it is in pursuit of those who attempt to avoid or evade tax with an announcement that it is working with US and Australian tax authorities on data which “reveals extensive use of complex offshore structures to conceal assets by wealthy individuals and companies”. Although this material is still in the process of being analysed, HMRC are using the threat of criminal prosecution or significant fines and public naming and shaming to encourage “voluntary compliance and early disclosure of tax irregularities”.</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/no-safe-havens-for-offshore-tax-cheats-hmrc-threaten-criminal-prosecutions</guid></item><item><title>Rape: deception as to intention vitiates consent</title><author>Jonathan Grimes</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/rape-deception-as-to-intention-vitiates-consent</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	In a decision published on 24 April 2013 the High Court took the “highly exceptional” step of ordering the CPS to review its decision not to prosecute in a case involving an allegation of rape. The court gave fresh consideration to the issue of consent and confirmed the principles set out in Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority [2011] EWHC 2849 (Admin).</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/rape-deception-as-to-intention-vitiates-consent</guid></item><item><title>Allowing disproportionate force in self-defence - a triumph of rhetoric over reason</title><author>Vivien Cochrane</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/allowing-disproportionate-force-in-self-defence-a-triumph-of-rhetoric-over-reason</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	The Crime and Courts Act 2013 received Royal Assent on 25 April 2013. Section 43 of the Act amends the current law in relation to self-defence.  What does this mean for self-defence in the home?</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/allowing-disproportionate-force-in-self-defence-a-triumph-of-rhetoric-over-reason</guid></item><item><title>General Medical Council: changes to Fitness to Practice Rules are now in force</title><author>Sarah Harris</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/regulatory-and-professional-discipline-blog/general-medical-council-changes-to-fitness-to-practice-rules-are-now-in-force</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	Important changes to the General Medical Council Fitness to Practise Rules will mean more power to case managers, civil rules of evidence and witness statements in lieu of examination-in-chief.</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/regulatory-and-professional-discipline-blog/general-medical-council-changes-to-fitness-to-practice-rules-are-now-in-force</guid></item><item><title>The National Crime Agency: a new super prosecutor?</title><author>Maya Silva</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/the-national-crime-agency-a-new-super-prosecutor</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	On 25 April 2012, the Crime and Court Bill 2012-13 received royal assent. Changes of note include the creation of the National Crime Agency (NCA) and the introduction of Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) in England and Wales which, it is proposed will be used by prosecutors in economic crime cases. </description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/the-national-crime-agency-a-new-super-prosecutor</guid></item><item><title>Criticisms of the Court of Protection – are they justified?</title><author>Simon Hardy</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/clinical-negligence-law-blog/criticisms-of-the-court-of-protection-are-they-justified</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	In an article of 28 April 2013, the Daily Mail continues its campaign against the perceived inefficiencies and failings of the Court of Protection.  Simon Hardy discusses this article and helps demystify the Court of Protection. </description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/clinical-negligence-law-blog/criticisms-of-the-court-of-protection-are-they-justified</guid></item><item><title>Is the Financial Conduct Authority’s Redress Scheme really offering redress?</title><author>Angus Wakeman</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/is-the-financial-conduct-authoritys-redress-scheme-really-offering-redress</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	It was reported in the Sunday Telegraph on 21 April 2013 that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) (formerly known as the ‘Financial Services Authority’ (FSA)) is facing a claim for judicial review of its Redress Scheme (“the Review”) which was intended to provide redress to individuals and businesses that were mis-sold interest rate hedging products. The FCA took over the Review of interest rate hedging products on 1 April 2013, as a consequence of the Financial Services Act 2012.</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/is-the-financial-conduct-authoritys-redress-scheme-really-offering-redress</guid></item><item><title>First FCA fine imposed as they continue FSAs work in sanctioning banks for money laundering failings</title><author>Claire Hegarty</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/first-fca-fine-imposed-as-they-continue-fsas-work-in-sanctioning-banks-for-money-laundering-failings</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	On 1 April 2013, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) replaced some of the functions of the Financial Services Authority.  

	On 24 April 2013, the FCA announced that it had fined the EFG Private Bank Ltd (EFG) £4,200,000 for breaches of Principle 3 (management and control) of the FSA’s Principles for Businesses for failures in managing money laundering risks. An early settlement discount of 30% was agreed; without this the fine imposed would have been £6 million. </description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/first-fca-fine-imposed-as-they-continue-fsas-work-in-sanctioning-banks-for-money-laundering-failings</guid></item><item><title>Family justice reforms: The demise of legal aid, the rise of the litigant in person and what lies ahead for family law</title><author>Lauren Evans</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/family-law-blog/family-justice-reforms-the-demise-of-legal-aid-the-rise-of-the-litigant-in-person-and-what-lies-ahead-for-family-law</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	The government overhaul of legal aid (public funding) came into force on 1 April 2013 and is due to affect the entire justice system.  Criminal barristers have begun striking, court staff are already striking and, with the family court system at breaking point, litigation is becoming even more of a last resort for privately paying clients.</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/family-law-blog/family-justice-reforms-the-demise-of-legal-aid-the-rise-of-the-litigant-in-person-and-what-lies-ahead-for-family-law</guid></item><item><title>Judicial review reform - will it work?</title><author>Adam Chapman</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/public-law-blog/judicial-review-reform-will-it-work</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	Adam Chapman discusses the Ministry of Justice&amp;amp;#39;s Response to the Consultation on reforming judicial review.</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/public-law-blog/judicial-review-reform-will-it-work</guid></item><item><title>Growth and Infrastructure Bill passed, but at what cost?</title><author>Richard Fox</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/employment-law-blog/growth-and-infrastructure-bill-passed-but-at-what-cost</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	Quite extraordinary developments in the House of Lords last night.  The Growth and Infrastructure Bill passed through the parliamentary “ping pong” process and made it to the Royal Assent stage by the skin of its teeth and only after the Government made concession after concession.  </description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/employment-law-blog/growth-and-infrastructure-bill-passed-but-at-what-cost</guid></item><item><title>Professional negligence claims - the breach must cause the loss</title><author>Kate Paley</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/professional-negligence-claims-the-breach-must-cause-the-loss</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	Negligence claims against professionals, such as financial advisors, solicitors, accountants and surveyors have been on the rise in recent years, and numbers are expected to continue to grow. This is due to an increased reliance on the advice of professionals (in both a personal and business context), claimants’ raised awareness of their legal rights, and the increasingly complex nature of work carried out. Further, in tough economic times, financial losses are often more evident.</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/professional-negligence-claims-the-breach-must-cause-the-loss</guid></item><item><title>The Corporate Manslaughter Act five years on - are the flood gates about to open?</title><author>Jonathan Grimes</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/the-corporate-manslaughter-act-five-years-on-are-the-flood-gates-about-to-open</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	This time last year The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act (&amp;amp;quot;the Act&amp;amp;quot;) appeared to have had little effect since coming into force in April 2008. Only two companies had been convicted, Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings Ltd and JMW Farms (a Northern Irish case that followed a guilty plea), and it appeared that there was a lack of appetite by both prosecutors and the police to use the legislation. Twelve months on there are some signs of change.</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/the-corporate-manslaughter-act-five-years-on-are-the-flood-gates-about-to-open</guid></item><item><title>Twitter users - how to avoid ending up in court</title><author>Ryan Mowat</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/twitter-users-how-to-avoid-ending-up-in-court</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	Lord McAlpine won the first stage of his libel battle against Sally Bercow, the Common’s speaker’s wife, last week. Mr Justice Tugenhadt ruled that the High Court should first decide whether Ms Bercow’s tweet to her 56,000 followers in November 2012 - &amp;amp;quot;Why is Lord McAlpine trending? *innocent face*&amp;amp;quot; – was capable of being defamatory. If Lord McAlpine is successful, the level of damages will be decided a subsequent hearing.
	 </description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/twitter-users-how-to-avoid-ending-up-in-court</guid></item><item><title>Universal Credit – to be reduced pound for pound by spousal maintenance</title><author>Abby Buckland</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/family-law-blog/universal-credit-to-be-reduced-pound-for-pound-by-spousal-maintenance</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	Labelled ‘the biggest shake up of the welfare system for a generation’, Universal Credit is a new welfare benefit in the United Kingdom that will replace seven of the main means-tested benefits and tax credits.

	In cases relying upon means tested benefits, family lawyers will struggle to estimate the timing or quantum of any impact upon receipt of benefits or the future entitlement of their client or client’s spouse. It will be crystal ball gazing to attempt to predict with any accuracy the payments that will be received after the changes have been implemented or when they will take effect in the appropriate region. Most crucial, however, is the treatment of unearned income under the new Universal Credit system. There will be a pound for pound reduction in Universal Credit Support for income received from ‘Universal Credit Equivalents’, which includes pension income from early retirement and most notably for family lawyers, spousal maintenance payments.</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/family-law-blog/universal-credit-to-be-reduced-pound-for-pound-by-spousal-maintenance</guid></item><item><title>Reforming Judicial Review – yet more proposals</title><author>Adam Chapman</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/public-law-blog/reforming-judicial-review-yet-more-proposals</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	Adam Chapman reviews the Government&amp;amp;#39;s further proposals to seek to reduce the number of judicial review challenges that are made.</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/public-law-blog/reforming-judicial-review-yet-more-proposals</guid></item><item><title>Here’s a novel idea - let’s have a prosecutor leading the CPS</title><author>Stephen Parkinson</author><link>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/heres-a-novel-idea-lets-have-a-prosecutor-leading-the-cps</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
	Writing in the Standard this week, Dominic Raab MP called for the Director of Public Prosecutions to be replaced with a criminal prosecutor when his term expires.

	It is astonishing that such a suggestion needs to be made. Most people would think it entirely obvious that the head of the Crown Prosecution Service, which is responsible for all prosecutions other than a tiny percentage of specialist cases, should have a deep understanding and practical experience of the work that he or she leads.</description><guid>http://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/news-and-events/blogs/criminal-law-blog/heres-a-novel-idea-lets-have-a-prosecutor-leading-the-cps</guid></item></channel></rss>
