<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Public Law Blog</title><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog</link><generator>KohanaPHP</generator><item><title>Extradition without safeguards: the troubling reach of the Crime and Policing Act 2026</title><author>Lord Carter of Haslemere CB and Rebecca Niblock</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/extradition-without-safeguards-the-troubling-reach-of-the-crime-and-policing-act-2026</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Imagine you are woken up one day with a loud knock at the door.  It is the police who have a warrant for your arrest pursuant to an extradition request from a European country which you visited on holiday a few years earlier. </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/extradition-without-safeguards-the-troubling-reach-of-the-crime-and-policing-act-2026</guid></item><item><title>Six takeaways from the King's Speech</title><author>Emily Carter and Katie Newbury</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/six-takeaways-from-the-kings-speech</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>In the King&amp;#39;s Speech today, the King announced a package of 35 bills for the next parliamentary session, covering everything from housing to immigration.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/six-takeaways-from-the-kings-speech</guid></item><item><title>“Recruitment Rewired”: what employers need to know about automated recruitment</title><author>Emily Carter and Kirsty Churm</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/recruitment-rewired-what-employers-need-to-know-about-automated-recruitment</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>
 On 31 March 2026, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) published its Report, “Recruitment Rewired: an update on the ICO’s work on the fair and responsible use of automation in recruitment”, setting out its findings and regulatory expectations for employers using AI‑enabled or automated tools in recruitment. 
</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/recruitment-rewired-what-employers-need-to-know-about-automated-recruitment</guid></item><item><title>The Southport Inquiry recommends extending powers under the Online Safety Act to compel social media companies to provide information</title><author>Charlie Roe</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/the-southport-inquiry-recommends-extending-powers-under-the-online-safety-act-to-compel-social-media-companies-to-provide-information</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>The report on Phase 1 of the Southport Inquiry into the murder of three young girls and injury of 10 others during an attack on a children’s dance club was published on 13 April 2026. The Inquiry has examined the perpetrator’s online activity in the lead up to the attack which demonstrates that he had accessed and viewed a variety of violent content, including through using computer systems at his school.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/the-southport-inquiry-recommends-extending-powers-under-the-online-safety-act-to-compel-social-media-companies-to-provide-information</guid></item><item><title>If children are banned from accessing ‘social media’, which platforms will they be banned from?</title><author>Fred Allen</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/if-children-are-banned-from-accessing-social-media-which-platforms-will-they-be-banned-from</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>In March 2026 the Government launched a wide-ranging consultation on children’s access to the internet, ‘Growing up in the online world: a national consultation’. As part of that consultation, the Government is looking at whether there should be a minimum age for children to access social media, or certain social media features, and what age would be right. The consultation follows Australia’s recent ban on social media for under 16s, and an announcement by the Greek government that they will  ban access to social media for children under 15 years old.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/if-children-are-banned-from-accessing-social-media-which-platforms-will-they-be-banned-from</guid></item><item><title>ECHR reform and five other Public Law developments to look out for in 2026</title><author>Fred Allen</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/echr-reform-and-five-other-public-law-developments-to-look-out-for-in-2026</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Fred Allen looks at ECHR reform and lists out five other public law developments to look out for in 2026</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/echr-reform-and-five-other-public-law-developments-to-look-out-for-in-2026</guid></item><item><title>AI and access to justice: Deepening the divide?</title><author>Emily Carter and Sahil Kher</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/ai-and-access-to-justice-deepening-the-divide</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Frontline legal services have the most to gain from artificial intelligence, but also face unique challenges in its provision.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/ai-and-access-to-justice-deepening-the-divide</guid></item><item><title>Enhancing Public Accountability: Key Elements of the Public Office (Accountability) Bill 2025</title><author>Kirsty Cook</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/enhancing-public-accountability-key-elements-of-the-public-office-accountability-bill-2025</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>After many years of campaigning, and further to the Government’s commitment to introduce a statutory duty of candour for public bodies, the  Public Office (Accountability) Bill 2025 (also known as the ‘Hillsborough Law’ bill) was introduced last week.  </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/enhancing-public-accountability-key-elements-of-the-public-office-accountability-bill-2025</guid></item><item><title>A New Era of Football Regulation - The Independent Football Regulator</title><author>Natalie Cohen and Kirsty Cook</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/a-new-era-of-football-regulation-the-independent-football-regulator</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>The new Independent Football Regulator (the “IFR”), which will oversee a new regulatory regime designed to protect and promote the sustainability of English men’s elite football, reached a significant milestone last week. </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/a-new-era-of-football-regulation-the-independent-football-regulator</guid></item><item><title>Tech-Driven, Ethically Bound: New FRC and ICAEW Guidance on AI Use in the Accountancy Sector</title><author>Ian Ko</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/tech-driven-ethically-bound-new-frc-and-icaew-guidance-on-ai-use-in-the-accountancy-sector</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Artificial Intelligence (AI) and digital tools are rapidly transforming the accountancy sector with promises of enhanced efficiency, insight and audit quality. Embracing this innovation wave however, does not come without risk, and regulators are increasingly alert to the ethical implications. The FRC has very recently issued new guidance on the use of AI in audit, coinciding with the ICAEW’s new technology-centred revisions to its Code of Ethics, which came into force on 1 July 2025. Responsible and ethical use of AI is now therefore no longer optional, but a regulatory expectation. </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/tech-driven-ethically-bound-new-frc-and-icaew-guidance-on-ai-use-in-the-accountancy-sector</guid></item><item><title>Statutory interpretation and “wild camping”: Supreme Court upholds the right to wild camp on the Dartmoor Commons</title><author>Sahil Kher and Caitlín Comins</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/statutory-interpretation-and-wild-camping-supreme-court-upholds-the-right-to-wild-camp-on-the-dartmoor-commons</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>In Darwall and another v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2025] UKSC 20 (21 May 2025), the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the public’s right to “wild camp” on the Dartmoor Commons (“the Commons”). Although the judgment only concerns Dartmoor, which is subject to specific legislation, it has rekindled a wider debate about public rights of access to nature across England and Wales.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/statutory-interpretation-and-wild-camping-supreme-court-upholds-the-right-to-wild-camp-on-the-dartmoor-commons</guid></item><item><title>‘Freedom of Speech in Parliament’</title><author>Lord Carter of Haslemere CB</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/freedom-of-speech-in-parliament</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Freedom of speech in Parliament is a key element of parliamentary privilege, protecting MPs and Lords from legal consequences for what they say in debates.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/freedom-of-speech-in-parliament</guid></item><item><title>Recognising and Responding to Early Warning Signs in the Public Sector</title><author>Lord Carter of Haslemere CB</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/recognising-and-responding-to-early-warning-signs-in-the-public-sector</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>The Committee on Standards in Public Life, an independent body which advises the Prime Minister on arrangements for upholding ethical standards of conduct, has marked its 30th anniversary by issuing a report relating to the need for better recognition by public sector bodies of early warning signs. </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/recognising-and-responding-to-early-warning-signs-in-the-public-sector</guid></item><item><title>Are we ruled by lawyers or politicians?</title><author>Lord Carter of Haslemere CB</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/are-we-ruled-by-lawyers-or-politicians</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The success or failure of a Government seldom turns on a legal principle, but there is a question as to whether this could happen in the case of this Labour Government.  Why?  Because the Prime Minister and the Attorney General, both eminent lawyers, have drawn a line in the sand with their absolute commitment to compliance with the ‘rule of law’. </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/are-we-ruled-by-lawyers-or-politicians</guid></item><item><title>Reform of Public Inquiries: an update on the Government's initial response</title><author>Kirsty Cook</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/reform-of-public-inquiries-an-update-on-the-governments-initial-response</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Following on from Kingsley Napley’s event in January which discussed the recent House of Lords Statutory Inquiries Committee’s report, the Government has now published its eagerly-awaited response.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/reform-of-public-inquiries-an-update-on-the-governments-initial-response</guid></item><item><title>AI Battles and Five other Public Law Developments to Look Out for in 2025</title><author>Fred Allen</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/ai-battles-and-five-other-public-law-developments-to-look-out-for-in-2025</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Hardly a day goes by without Artificial Intelligence dominating the headlines. Much ink has been spilled about the deployment of AI and algorithmic decision-making tools by the state. As programmes continue to be rolled out, it seems inevitable that some will start to be rolled back as a result of legal challenges. Concerns have already been raised about tools being used in immigration investigations and decision-making, the criminal justice system, and the welfare system.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/ai-battles-and-five-other-public-law-developments-to-look-out-for-in-2025</guid></item><item><title>Case Summary: R (Bournemouth, Poole and Christchurch Council) -v- Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman [2025] EWHC 224 (Admin)</title><author>Charlie Roe</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/case-summary-r-bournemouth-poole-and-christchurch-council-v-local-government-and-social-care-ombudsman-2025-ewhc-224-admin</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>This case concerned the lawfulness of mandatory extra charges levied by private nurseries on parents accessing free childcare through the government’s Free Early Education Entitlement (“FEEE”) scheme. 

 

 

 </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/case-summary-r-bournemouth-poole-and-christchurch-council-v-local-government-and-social-care-ombudsman-2025-ewhc-224-admin</guid></item><item><title>Making Public Inquiries Work - with Joshua Rozenberg and Baroness Sanderson</title><author>Emily Carter and Natalie Cohen</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/making-public-inquiries-work-with-joshua-rozenberg-and-baroness-sanderson</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Last night, Kingsley Napley welcomed Joshua Rozenberg to its offices to chair an expert panel to discuss a highly topical issue: “Making Public Inquiries Work”. It was a fascinating event which underlined the need for reform, innovation, and fresh thinking to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of public inquiries.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/making-public-inquiries-work-with-joshua-rozenberg-and-baroness-sanderson</guid></item><item><title>Alternative remedies in judicial review: the case of Re McAleenon [2024] UKSC 31</title><author>Sahil Kher and Andrea Dalling</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/alternative-remedies-in-judicial-review-the-case-of-re-mcaleenon-2024-uksc-31</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>In October, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment providing guidance on the approach to be taken where a regulator who is subject to judicial review proceedings contends that the claim should be dismissed due to an “alternative suitable remedy”.  </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/alternative-remedies-in-judicial-review-the-case-of-re-mcaleenon-2024-uksc-31</guid></item><item><title>Is reform of public inquiries now on the horizon?</title><author>Natalie Cohen</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/is-reform-of-public-inquiries-now-on-the-horizon</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>On 16 September 2024 the House of Lords Statutory Inquiries Committee (“the Committee”) published its report looking into the efficacy of the law and practice relating to statutory public inquiries held under the Inquiries Act 2005. The Committee, with Lord Norton of Louth as its chair, conducted oral sessions and considered written evidence from a selection of individuals and organisations including academics, experts, government officials, former Ministers, former inquiry chairs, secretaries, solicitors, barristers, representatives from campaign organisations and other interest groups.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/public-law-blog/is-reform-of-public-inquiries-now-on-the-horizon</guid></item></channel></rss>
